>>734193>I don't understandClearly.
Pretty much what he's doing in that clip is what I laugh at dude bros for doing when they "hit the bag" at the local YMCA.
He's flailing, and when he connects he's pushing instead of hitting, and he's throwing with his hands down.
>Did you study his bag work for several weeks and build up a set of information?No. Because a guy who actually knows what he is doing is going to subconsciously not do the things Bruce Lee was doing in that training clip that are beginner level issues.
>Otherwise you shouldn't speak so clearlyThe one time there is indisputable video evidence the Bruce Lee nutriders can't wait to say it's not good enough.
Would it be good enough if it was a 10 to 15 second clip of him beating up that imaginary white guy who went to his HK high school and was an imaginary golden glove boxer, and that no one can find any proof what so ever of actually existing?
>>734190>Don't know what to tell you manThat you've never read the Tao of JKD?
>I train JKD from a guy who learned from Ted Wong, and the only wing chun punch is the straight leadWhich means you're training with someone who is alive, and has taken things from other places. Which is fine, and what JKD is allegedly supposed to be about.
But I'm not talking about what Ted Wong or Dan Inosanto, or the guys who trained under them, are doing now.
I'm saying that what Bruce Lee was doing right before his death, if you are to believe the Tao of JKD and the few videos of him training, was still heavily based on Wing Chun for hand work (not just punching, but trapping was still a large part of his training according to his notes) and his actual punching outside of choreographed fight scenes was absolute garbage and an amateur boxer with just one fight would have trounced him.
