>>939049>If you worked at a bank, or as a actuary or accountant, couldn't you just pull that from one of the files and pretend that it was yours?Sure. Also, I could steal it from my neighbors mailbox. Or I could print fake statements, three-hole punch them, and pass them off as legit.
You're new here, and I can't expect everyone to know my post history on /biz/. This is especially true since we lost our permanent archive and my older posts are lost forever. So at the end of the day, you're free to believe or disbelieve as you choose.
>>939050>Nice trust fund.No, I earned my wealth. I did inherit $250K a few years back, for which I'm grateful, but I was already a multi-millionaire at that point.
>>939065As I told the other newfriend, you're free to believe or not believe whatever you wish. I'll never be able to provide 100% definitive evidence of my wealth without giving up personal details, which will never happen.
But thinking that I work at Vanguard is about the dumbest suggestion possible. Someone posting a client's personal financial statement would face not only immediate termination, but also civil and likely criminal charges. Seems like a pretty stupid thing to do for someone otherwise gainfully employed at a solid company.
Look, I get that you're never going to admit you're wrong. Its an anonymous message board, so other that the humiliation you're suffering in this thread, there's no reason for you to admit your errors. Eventually this thread will fade away, and no one will ever know what an idiot you are (at least not from this thread). So that's fine.
But the fact remains that you recommended <50% allocation of equities to an audience primarily comprised of 18-26 year olds (
>>937741). That's objectively bad advice, and I called you on it. My critique is valid regardless of my net worth, because dumb advice is still dumb advice regardless of who points it out. And that's what really matters here.
