>>8673465Me: Why the fuck would I tell a cosplayer [that I want to shoot with her because of her sex appeal] when they CHOOSE or CHANGE a character precisely for the amount of boobs (or ass, or legs, etc.) they show?
You: So you have psychic powers and can tell when a girl has picked a character based solely on tits and ass exposure? Neat. You know every franchise ever and can tell when a costume is not canon or an alt, and has been altered by the cosplayer for sex appeal? Cool! What a talented man you are.
At this point, me asking you if you're stupid would only make me look stupid.
I've seen photos of a Princess Peach with her entire ass hanging out. I don't know for SURE it's not an official alternate costume, but I can make an educated guess that it's not. There are plenty of other examples. Google "Sexy _____" and be amazed.
I didn't say that I only shoot revealing cosplays, and I actually said that I don't have ANY revealing cosplay shots in my portfolio, so according to your own standards, I'm not weird or a creep. I'm responding to the other anon, who was mad at an unnamed photographer that didn't want to shoot with her because her cosplay was boring, or they just felt like shooting with the more revealing, more attractive coslayers.
"Thinking with your dick" is an old, respected, and valid approach to creating art, and should not be shamed. Do you think the Old Masters didn't choose models based on how much they wanted to fuck them? Or that the successful photographers of today don't do the same? Sexually charged art is still art.
Fuck your naivete. If no one wants to shoot with you, it's because you're boring. If you want people to shoot with you, give them a reason to. No one can force you to cosplay something other than Attack on Harley Quinn, so you have NO RIGHT to tell any photographer what they should or should not be shooting.
Grow the hell up, and get over yourself.
