/ck/ - Food & Cooking » Thread #7018295

[19 / 1 / ?]

108KiB, 1024x1024, 1024px-Burger_King_Logo.svg.png

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 21:51:56 No.7018295 View Reply Report Delete

Is it healthier to eat nothing for three months and only drink water or eat burger king three times a day for the same period of time?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 21:53:30 No.7018299 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7018306 >>7019198

Well, option A, you die. Option B, you just get fat.

So I would say option B.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 21:55:00 No.7018305 Report Delete

Quoted By:

The sensible conclusion to this line of questioning is that Burger King is health food.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 21:55:02 No.7018306 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7018299

This.

Thread sux OP is faggot who wants his face fucked.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 23:25:24 No.7018589 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Just get grilled chicken sandwiches and sub the mayo for mustard

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 23:37:46 No.7018613 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7018295
>eat nothing for three months and only drink water
Are you asking if dying is healthier than eating Burger King?
That's a tough one, OP.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:08:50 No.7019198 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019206

>>7018299
Not necessarily. If OP is a maximum lardass he could live for more than 3 months without eating.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:12:43 No.7019201 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019203

Fazoli's!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:15:21 No.7019203 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7019201
Lel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:16:06 No.7019204 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Eat burger king and take a multivitamin. Count your calories to make sure you're not eating more than you're expending. You'll survive and maintain your weight with not much issue.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:17:14 No.7019206 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019277

>>7019198
false

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:19:20 No.7019211 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Well one diet has no calories while the other one does.
I'm no scientist, but if you were The King of Fat you might be able to survive on a water diet. Given that you were still getting your vitamins and minerals as well.
But if you're a skinny fuck then you will die if you go with the first option.
And to answer your question, no neither of them are healthy OP.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:26:44 No.7019221 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019228

Nobody would die from not eating for 3 months.

Maybe a spooky scary skelington man but that's it.

Option A is better.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 04:31:32 No.7019228 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019277

>>7019221
>Nobody would die from not eating for 3 months.

This is bait, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 05:25:08 No.7019277 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019289 >>7019309

>>7019206
>>7019228
Nope, assuming he supps in some electrolytes and certain vitamins, he should be fine until he gets to skellington status.
It would feel dreadful, but the body stores fat for the long periods without food.
There are plenty of documented cases of people surviving two months without food, but these are mostly normal people that got stranded or fasted.
A fatty that could maintain a supply of electrolytes and vitamins that the body can't produce could last a very long time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 05:34:21 No.7019289 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019308

>>7019277
Everything about this is wrong. Modest estimates rarely go longer than a month, and it's almost impossible to find cases of more than 40 days.

If you were extremely obese, you would still simply die as your body cannot produce the proteins it needs to keep itself alive and you would have organ failure.

>BUT MUH FAT

Fat is fucking fat. It's good at storing calories; that's it. You could not live on a diet of human fat.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 05:46:13 No.7019308 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7019314

>>7019289
Kek, it's pretty easy to find cases lasting more than 40 days
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Irish_hunger_strike#Participants_who_died_on_hunger_strike
And that's without maintaining blood tonicity or providing vitamin supplements, which may become the limiting factor in protein formation before lack of protein becomes a factor (due to muscle breakdown).

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 05:46:47 No.7019309 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7019277
>There are plenty of documented cases of people surviving two months without food, but these are mostly normal people that got stranded or fasted.
No, actually the longest documented confirmed case of someone surviving with no food and total hydration is 40 days. There have been people that have survived longer much with very little food, as well as unverifiable stories of times with no food going more than 40 days. But generally the rule of thumb is 3-5...hours with no shelter (in sub zero temps), Days with no water, and weeks with no food.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 05:50:24 No.7019314 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7019308
And here is a case of a fatty under medical supervision doing pretty much exactly what I'm talking about http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/07/24/3549931.htm

Subject

Name

E-mail

Password

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these boards

Your latest searches