>>76910531Okay, how about this: WHY IS SHE TAKING A FUCKING BABY INTO HIGH DANGER SITUATIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE?!
It's one thing to create a defensive item for an infant who will be in danger regardless of what you do. But quite another thing entirely to actively engage in dangerous activity with a baby.
Since it was yet to pop out, I used the term misccarriage, but if that word offends you how about: CHILD ENDANGERMENT. No? Then why not: CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE. INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER. Or how about: HOMICIDE. MURDER.
Even with supertech, it's a risk that is absolutely criminal.
And keep in mind, Hopeless last wrote her as being an even more of a human failure engine than Hawkeye. Intentionally. Pardon me for not putting stock in even Starktech saving her ass.
