>>894178Have you ever thought about doing any, single fucking form of liability and/or market research before you spent all that time, energy and other people's money on a prototype?
You need to know exactly what kind of customer you are planning to serve, before thinking about making anything. You need to find out their needs and requirements. You need to find out how they are going to use it, and for what purpose. And you need to prove to them your platform is _very_ safe, reliable, and profitable. Which it will never be, since the CAA doesn't allow urban flight and the countryside has no real demand for this kind of drone application. Maybe one neckbeard that still lives with his mom somewhere out in the sticks.
You just went tinkering and thought the rules don't apply to you. And that people still get wet for drones like it's 2011.
Nobody is going to want this shit. Delivery drones... Seriously? Who would buy this? It's not economical, profitable, or even worth the initial investment.
For instance, have you even put some real actual, real life thought about how you are going to control your piece of shit? 2.4G works awesome for 2-3 miles line of sight if you use an illegal high-power transmitter. But since you're aiming "Business Use" you need to abide to any and all laws. That includes the radio links. The fines for fucking about in the radio spectrum are easily a couple thousands pounds.
10/10 skrub please try again