>>10556506but as I've previously stated, I didn't make any value judgement. read my post again. I don't even care about that much about trends.
>>10556508>saving the picture of a graph doesn't mean you know how to use it or in what context it was madeit was saved ad hoc for this thread.
but models like it are in many textbooks on fashion and trend forecasting (also in marketing).
the percentages in the graph are, of course, quite arbitrary. but the different values has a normal distribution, as to be expected, and these kinds of models are very much used for commercial trend forecasting (despite what you want to believe).
>>10556522I do not frequent /mu/
