/g/ - Technology » Thread #51028390

>>51028390
Same shit science that told us all fats were bad for us. So, we replaced all our fats with sugar and now we're more obese and diabetic than ever. I wonder how much of this is because of sugar and carb intake alongside processed meats. WHO KNOWS BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY RUN ANY EXPERIMENTS

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:36:36 No.51029213 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51029486

>>51029182
0 gravity is cray

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:38:05 No.51029237 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51029280

>>51029142
Shut the fuck up with your meme bullshit, you're more cancerous than bacon you cunt.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:40:13 No.51029280 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51029237
being an asshole is a meme.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:43:55 No.51029353 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51028390
Definitely nothing computer related. Modern software and hardware are just layer upon layer of outdated formats, insecure protocols, and other crufty bullshit that no one wants to replace because they're too retarded to look past their nose and understand the concept of technical debt.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:50:25 No.51029486 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51029213
It's not really 0G specifically, it just makes it easier for what's happening to happen. It's angular momentum that causes the spinning item to flip every so often.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:54:54 No.51029571 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51028941
The 80's one uses an experts system, which is incapable of adapting and ridiculously expensive to create and maintain as well as being full of bugs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:56:37 No.51029603 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51029079
I don't see the point in 4G LTE.
The over 20MBs of 4G alone is fast enough.

I know you're just going to reply insulting me or saying that nothing is ever fast enough(which is true) but I don't see the point when they just throttle once you reach whatever amount of GBs your psp thinks is enough. Throttling on the other hand is something that they should work to remove instead.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:58:22 No.51029638 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51030616 >>51031042

>>51029190
The problem isn't sugar, it's seldom used anyways.
The problem is HFCS.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:43:32 No.51030320 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51028900
>not even close
>meanwhile they're literally crossing the entire country without drivers and on the streets with you.

Haha whatever you say, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:45:37 No.51030345 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51028390
Practical 3D printers if they count.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:03:36 No.51030569 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51029079
Isn't widespread enough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:07:24 No.51030616 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51031042

>>51029638
You are a moron.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:40:28 No.51031042 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51030616
>>51029638
Just to expound on this thought. This guy is likely a fucking sugar shill and this is a waste of time, but I'm gonna do it anyway. The prevalence of HFCS is due to it being a cheap substitute for sugar. It acts essentially the same as sugar and sugar acts essentially the same as HFCS. It's all shit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO systemd2.jpg, 125KiB, 1024x577

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:45:29 No.51031101 Report Delete

Quoted By:

lennartware

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:51:16 No.51031160 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51028390
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oEFwyoWKXo

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:55:29 No.51031219 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51031313 >>51031501

probably actual road-ready self driving cars that are practical and safe. Those are the future and I cant fucking wait

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:02:15 No.51031313 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51031342 >>51031501

>>51028586
>>51031219
>self driving cars
why do you people trust technology so much?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:04:33 No.51031342 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51031443 >>51031501

>>51031313
they have had no accidents of their own cause. they don't make mistakes really.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:13:28 No.51031443 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>51031497 >>51031501

>>51031342
how many of these cars are there? have they tried make them interact with one each other?

how about they make good, secure, fast, automated public transport instead, like trains or something?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:17:56 No.51031497 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51031443
>have they tried make them interact with one each other?
Why would they interact? Sel-driving cars see self-driving cars as exactly the same as human-driven cars.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:18:22 No.51031501 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>51031219
>>51031313
>>51031342
>>51031443
>driving in my new apple icar
>just finished watching the ad that you need to watch before the ignition starts
>going really fast now
>passing androidcar plebs at light speed
>their cars are all stopped because of shitty manufacturer firmwares
>i laugh in their faces
>look up at the street sign
>"كباب أكبر ST"
>ohfuck
>my icar starts accelerating uncontrolably
>the screens go blank
>it bursts into flames
thanks robot cars

Subject

Name

E-mail

Password

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these boards

Your latest searches