>>2511481>>board moves too slowly>But it wouldn't if you were posting in it?I don't think you understand - I mean that the threads take ages to die. On /s/ it only lasted for a day, which I think is good length of time.
>You mean people are forced to post good quality images???You just posted an image covered with horrible JPG artifacts, so clearly the restriction isn't foolproof. I have plenty of images that are less than 1000x1000, but still good quality and worth posting.
>>we already have a permanent thread here>What?This thread that you're posting in now has been up for nearly 2 months
