>>2261268>>2264297 (almost good)>>2264520>>2264555>>2264713okay
>>2265563>>2265915>>2266170mediocre
>>2260844>>2260925>>2261033>>2261119>>2261157>>2261369>>2264069shit
>>2260516it's probably too late in thread for you to do this but
> Why do some things that look halfway decent get put in "shit" and "mediocre" while obviously bad artists get put in "good" or "okay"?post some examples and i'll explain. i'm curious what you think i put in "shit" is "decent" because i put the worst stuff in that category.
>>2260536>Are you judging these from a technical or conceptual POV?technical, the artists control and use of artistic fundamentals, such as how good an artist is at drawing a well balanced character drawing (this doesn't mean "realistic" but being natural and having the weight distributed correctly).
> If something is well done but a style/theme you don't like does it get put into "shit" automatically or have you given "points" to things regardless of it was your taste or not?i don't care about style in regards to critique. if you draw weird fetish shit or anime or more stylized western cartooning or furry, i don't take in account what your art is about, just how well done it is.
>>2260540anon regardless of you seeing my art or not doesn't change the truth about your own.
>>2260712one tumblr is a guy posting selfies of himself and the other is photo manipulation
ie not art
>>2260832which one are you
>>2265502there's no point in being different by being worse.
don't take that as me wanting you to start drawing generic concept art concepts, though
