>>49966526I really, really dislike the "muh story" and "muh graphics" faggots nowadays. They are the main reason why gaming overall is extremely shit in the west.
Look at naughty dog, they used to release god tier platformers. Nowadays they just bring out sub par movie games. Most of the current day western devs are failed moviemakers who are pushing their useless shit in their videogames for the purpose of "le art XD".
I have serious problems with hiding my power levels when i hear someone say they play games for the story, and say that the more cutscenes the better. It triggers me extremely.
Thank god we still have japan.
>>49966635It wasnt the greatest games, but it was very good for its time.
I mean, for all i care fallout 1/2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>3>>new vegas.
It doesnt really matter, both 3 and vegas are really not that far appart, but both dont even come close to the originals.
>>49966752New vegas did come out later. It was also a bugged piece of shit (like every obsidian game)
>The only reason Fallout got popular was cause of its' story. FUck no. I played fallout 1 and 2 literally a million times. You dont play a game a million time because of its story. Gameplay is by far the most imporrant.
>RPGs should have good stories and great ways to interact with the story by prerequisite. But I guess that's old fashioned nowadays.A good story is a plus, but it should never in a million years have priority over good gameplay.
Thats what i hate so much, just put all the money in graphics and story. Why do the hard thing and focus on gameplay when the casuals eat up graphics?
>Fallout 3 has no redeeming quality.It was fun. I enjoyed it for its time. Weapons, blowing things up, i felt that the atmosphere and locations was better in fallout 3. I found new vegas rather boring and not near the "dangerous" feeling i had when exploring.
