>>50056048dislike it all you want but France is the world's smallest country to have developped its own form of nuclear power, and it is also the only nation other than the USA to have developped a jet carrier catapult. If it doesn't seem that much impressive to you, remember that the USSR and all its might couldn't despite many, many efforts. And US plans.
I'd also recall you that you didn't "roll" over France in both WW. Like it or not again, but you were stopped by them in WWI, despite being twice their fucking size. And in WWII, it was fast, but not easy. You can verify for yourself that the Luftwaffe lost more planes during the 2months of the battle of France than during the 4 months of the Battle of Britain (respectively 1059 and 1052, "b-but brits are so brave") , you also lost the first tank-tank battle ever, despite heavily outnumbering the French tanks. and having artillery support. And having full air support, while the French didn't (I mean the battle of Hannut). To end this, French engineering isn't bad at all, it's just slowly processed because the French can (and do) enjoy their lives outside of the fucking factory.
For instance, in 1940, the D520 was the best plane to fight. It was easily forgotten though. Maybe because at the start of the war, France had only 18 of those (vs 3000 german planes).
>Why are you so based? how can you say it was the best???Well, having a 2.5 k/d ratio vs the Luftwaffe without using Dowding's "small packs" strategy was pretty badass, given this was the asymptotic limit the brits wished to reach. But also because its building time was a third of the Spitfire's one. And also because it had a 20 mm canon (the French were the first to put canons on their planes btw, and the whole world evolved to that, hence the superiority).
Anyway,
>>50056529I hate Germans too. No, I love them, except when they're the frustrated cucks they were raised to be after the >>>CRUSHING DEFEAT<<< they suffered against Napoleon.
>good job anon 
