>>50068588>You are claiming that redistributing money only brings positives and nobody is affected negatively in any way.I've never said that "so how come we don't share all the money to everyone so everyone can become smart like magic if money is the solution" can't you see the irony there?
>This is not the case when it comes to money.So inequality is the solution then? I am equating inequality to inequality m8, you just said m8 back in your first reply that "because the less inequality there is the less incentive there is to improve your situation". So if incentives are what makes them thrive why don't we push inequality further, that way people will have more incentives to thrive harder. That's why a blind guy that has succeeded in re-integrating in society is probably much more succesful and up to anything than a guy that has lived all his life seeing, but at what cost? The same could be applied to a poor guy, that strived all his life working in shitty jobs and living in shit having to save up money to buy food, but if someday he thrives he would be more up to anything than a guy that lived all his life with money to spend, but at what cost this had to happen?
