>>50088532>This is how it started. Objectively FALSE. Japan was fighting the US Navy at the same time as well as US forces in the pacific and east asia.I didnt even argue that though. I said we fought them alone, which we did, in south and south east asia which I amended to excluding the phillipines once I realised that it included it. You havent refuted this and you still havent.
>You are wrong, it took the Americans time to get to East Asia. Objectively FALSE. Americans fought in the Philippines.Im not talking about east asia, Im talking about south and south east asia. And I never said it took them time to get there, you said that and for no reason whatsoever as it did not hold any relevence to what I was saying. And when I said south and south east asia I amended it before you even posted a reply.
>But their island hopping strategy meant they took a while to get to where Britain was fighting them. Objectively FALSE. Americans didn't need to island hop anywhere, they were already present in the Philippines.I never said anything like this, and it holds no relevence to the battles which I posted as I had already excluded the philippines and the americans werent present at any of the locations or battles which I was referring to. What is your obsession with the philippines?
>Your entire argument is that the UK had to fight Japan aloneMy argument is that we fought them alone; which we did; in south and south east asia. I provided links to prove this and you have not refuted them. If you are somehow getting confused and thinking that I am referring to the entire war instead of the area, times and battles that I specified then your mistake is not an argument in itself.
>You're retarded argument which keeps getting "amended" every other post.I merely amended one thing which I didnt mean to refer to before you even replied to it yet you keep coming back to it as if attacking something which I am not even arguing is somehow an argument. How do you breathe?
