/int/ - International » Thread #50098150

[130 / 17 / ?]

42KiB, 700x611, 11828813_940640056005001_1196561470890229280_n__700.jpg

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:07:37 No.50098150 View Reply Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50098277 >>50099471 >>50099581 >>50099664 >>50100140 >>50100399 >>50100418 >>50100536 >>50100562 >>50100684 >>50102167 >>50103423 >>50103461 >>50103865 >>50104226

Was Napoleon the bad guy?
Is it appropriate to compare him to Hitler?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:09:01 No.50098203 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50098242

no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:09:28 No.50098216 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50098352

There is no "good guy" or "bad guy" in history

Hitler was different from Napoleon, even if they were both conqueror

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:09:52 No.50098234 Report Delete

Quoted By:

no he gave us our independence

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:10:07 No.50098242 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50100470 >>50101886

>>50098203
He was antisemitic

He blamed the jews for every usury and lie in europe

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:10:25 No.50098255 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50098279 >>50099938 >>50100245 >>50104847

is it true that Napoleon was a C*rsican, not French and shouldn't be referred as one?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:10:55 No.50098277 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
no he was cool

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:10:56 No.50098279 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098255
10/10 bait

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:12:56 No.50098352 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50100370 >>50102241

>>50098216
>There is no "good guy" or "bad guy" in history
Sure, there is.

Jesus = Good
Muhammad = Bad

It's not hard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:15:43 No.50098462 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50099251 >>50100313 >>50101836

He was responsible for 20 years of nonstop war and the death and destruction that goes with it.
He also spread liberal ideas and law codes throughout much of Europe which was a good thing.

He also didn't genocide anyone and people got same rights no matter if Jew or whatever.
So infinitely better than Hitler.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:37:01 No.50099251 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50099582 >>50100439 >>50100533

>>50098462
>TRIGGERED
No you Germanic fuck, he wasn't responsable for shit. France didn't attack its neighbours, the neighbours tried (AND FAILED FAGGOTS YOU CAN'T TOUCH US) to reinstaure monarchy in France.
Napoleon was there at the right time, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>KICKED THEIR ASS<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

But no, technically he didn't started a war.
He attacked Russia during a """""peace"""" period (but every historian agree it was a smart move since the russians were about to attack) and he turned against Spain pretty impulsively too (but that can hardly be called a war, those monkeys aren't worth shit. As long as some one doesn't come to do their job in their place)

anyway, obviously very very very better than Adolfus Maximus

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:42:46 No.50099471 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
>Is it appropriate to compare him to Hitler?
no

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:44:55 No.50099571 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Napoléon is a hero, like Batman

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:45:07 No.50099581 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
>Was Napoleon the bad guy?
no.
>Is it appropriate to compare him to Hitler?
Fuck you, no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:45:08 No.50099582 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50099251
settle down lad you're on a Thai paint sharing forum

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:47:03 No.50099657 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50099839

Unlike Hitler, he seemed to know what the fuck he is doing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:47:08 No.50099664 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50099821

>>50098150
nah he gave us our imperial century

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:51:02 No.50099821 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50099918 >>50099985 >>50102864

>>50099664
Brits are the real bad guys here. Every war consists of them convincing continental Europe to ally against a threat, watch them get their asses kicked for years, then finally join in and reap the benifits

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:51:22 No.50099839 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50099657
lol, it was dumb luck for Hitler for him getting into power.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:52:54 No.50099918 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50099821
LOOK WHO'S TALKING LADS YODELLLELOLEOLEOLLLELELELEOLEOLEOLEOLEOLE

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:53:21 No.50099938 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098255
The short answer is that he is a Frenchman of Italian decent.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:54:19 No.50099985 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50099821
We could learn from that

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:54:39 No.50099998 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Napoleon did nothing wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:57:12 No.50100140 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101920

>>50098150
>Was Napoleon the bad guy?
No, Br*t propaganda tbh
>Is it appropriate to compare him to Hitler?
no

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 15:59:58 No.50100245 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098255
This equates to saying that Washing was not American but Virginian...

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:01:43 No.50100313 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098462
>He was responsible for 20 years of nonstop war

Pretty sure he wasnt

>Britain declared war on France on 18 May, thus starting the Napoleonic Wars that would rage in Europe for the following 12 years.[43]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Amiens

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:02:47 No.50100370 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098352
Actually Jesus was just your random faggot that the Romans promoted to try to pacify the Jews with his peace and tolerance teachings. The oldest and most successful of all false flags ever. It was so good eventually the Romans themselves fell for it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Napoleons_retreat_from_moscow.jpg, 220KiB, 800x570

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:02:52 No.50100376 Report Delete

Quoted By:

JUST

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:03:30 No.50100399 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
It depends on the point of view of your nation, I believe that for the most part yes.

>Is it appropriate to compare him to Hitler?
Had any won the outcome for us around these parts would have been the same so again I vote yes

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Night_Bivouac_of_Great_Army.jpg, 399KiB, 994x682

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:03:36 No.50100406 Report Delete

Quoted By:

FREEZE

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:03:56 No.50100418 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
>Was Napoleon the bad guy?
For the majority of Europe, yes, he indirectly killed millions of people.
>Is it appropriate to compare him to Hitler?
no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:04:23 No.50100439 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50100548

>>50099251
But the monarchy was reinstated afterwards. Also he was a goddamn monarch himself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:04:40 No.50100450 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50100689

is it true he was actually not short and the myth that he was short is English propaganda?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:05:08 No.50100470 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098242
the savior of western values

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:05:11 No.50100471 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>>/his/

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:05:13 No.50100472 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50100652

He was a good military leader. Which makes him incomparable to Hitler by default.

Probably the most worthy foe England has ever had.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:05:53 No.50100495 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>Is it appropriate to compare him to Hitler?

No, Hitler was a pleb

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1411987593455.jpg, 98KiB, 900x900

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:06:55 No.50100533 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50099251
>mfw you're just some frenchcuck who got annexed to Switzerland at the conference of Vienna

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:06:59 No.50100536 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
Napoleon was absolutely based, easily one of the best Frenchmen ever.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:07:16 No.50100548 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50105144 >>50107661

>>50100439
>Also he was a goddamn monarch himself.

He was a lowborn ruling one of the main european powers
Other monarchies couldn't tolerate that which is why they kept attacking him

Flip

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Bonaparte_on_the_Bridge_at_Arcole.jpg, 203KiB, 990x1400

Flip Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:07:40 No.50100562 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
Napoleon was a good boy actually
Spreading Freedom and Democracy to Europe

But then he turned to the Dark Side of the Force.
>YOU WERE THE CHOSEN OOOONE.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO wash.png, 121KiB, 322x706

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:09:52 No.50100652 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101360

>>50100472
>Probably the most worthy foe England has ever had.

You which
But your "greatest foe" is the surrender monkey pic related by right of election

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9204961/George-Washington-named-Britains-greatest-ever-foe.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:10:37 No.50100684 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
He was redpilled but still just a figurehead, like Hitler.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:10:42 No.50100689 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50100770 >>50100830 >>50100999 >>50102175

>>50100450
It's funny that Horatio Nelson was a good decimeter shorter than Napoleon. He was even laughably short for hid era, but no one portrais him as a manlet

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:13:02 No.50100770 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50100689
because he never had the importance

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:14:24 No.50100830 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50100689
>but no one portrais him as a manlet

Because he's irrelevant
Who knows him aside from Brits?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:18:25 No.50100999 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50100689
Even the most normal fag American knows who Napoleon(good or bad) is but no one knows or would give a shit about Horatio.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:20:56 No.50101104 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101160 >>50101331

Yes, in the sense that he was a conqueror and a National Hero.

He didn't do the mass persecution of singular peoples like Jews and Gypsies, so people tend not to think of him in that light.

People tend to only remember Hitler as that guy who killed all those jews.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:22:10 No.50101160 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101274 >>50102387

>>50101104
Are you a conqueror if you're BTFOing everyone in self defense ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:24:50 No.50101274 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101160
Yes, that was much of Charlemagne's deal as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:24:51 No.50101276 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101313 >>50101408

when did napoleon even live? I don't know when the french revolution was

inb4 google it I'm on my phone and can't be fucked

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO us.gif, 359B, 16x11

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:25:49 No.50101313 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101276

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:26:24 No.50101331 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101104
>He didn't do the mass persecution of singular peoples like Jews and Gypsies, so people tend not to think of him in that light.

There's that and the fact Napoleon was an authoritarian leader in an era when all Europe was
The only difference between Napoleon and the Austrian Emperor, the British king and the Russian Tsar is that they became dictator by birth while he did through his actions

Meanwhile, Hitler was a dictator in an era when a good chunk of Europe was ruled by democratic leaders

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:27:08 No.50101360 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101413 >>50101502 >>50102665

>>50100652
No idea how that poll happened. Probably because he was the biggest traitor we've had since Cromwell. He lost most of the battles he fought against us, and would have been wrecked outright if it wasn't for you chaps.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:28:17 No.50101408 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101598 >>50101626 >>50102059

>>50101276
The French Revolution was a decade before the American one (we inspired you)
Napoleon also happens to be the grandfather of Lafayette

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:28:28 No.50101413 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101360

>Cromwell
>traitor

fuck off back to the shitty part of ireland

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:30:46 No.50101502 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101360
Isn't it a coming of age ritual in the UK to betray someone/something ?

he just went a little overboard

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:30:48 No.50101503 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101612 >>50101648

>all the other European monarchies get 100% anal pained France isn't a monarchy anymore
>spend 20 years straight trying to beat France up despite forming alliances made up of multiple countries
>TWENTY FUCKING YEARS

cant make this shit tbh, Napoleon was larger than life and absolutely based

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:32:48 No.50101598 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101629 >>50101674

>>50101408
the opposite mate, the american revolution happened before. It's bankrupted us

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:33:01 No.50101612 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101503

he even killed papists and told the pope to fuck off

there is no man greater than him

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1425441879312.png, 78KiB, 698x658

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:33:28 No.50101626 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101408
>The French Revolution was a decade before the American one
Jesus, France

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1311588858177.jpg, 7KiB, 241x216

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:33:30 No.50101629 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101598

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO RevolutionaryWars.png, 281KiB, 1645x984

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:33:52 No.50101648 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50103725

>>50101503
What France did after the revolution was one of the most impressive thing in all history imo (tied only by Germany's performance in WW2)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:34:24 No.50101674 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101786

>>50101598

>get bankrupted by bankrolling America's revolution
>loose Qubec to Canada
>end up selling the rest of Louisiana to the US
>then get your shit stomped in by slavs
>200 years later sell yourself to germany because "muh eu integrationism"

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:36:37 No.50101786 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101897 >>50102622

>>50101674
You mean
>loan money to US
>wow thank you greatest ally
>later on overthrow king for freedom blabla
>what money )))))))

Fucking amerikikes

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:37:47 No.50101836 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50101993 >>50102149

>>50098462
This. Except a lot of his military actions were preemptive.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 76397686.jpg, 170KiB, 631x564

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:38:56 No.50101886 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102157

>>50098242
That's absolutely false, he in fact rehabilitated the Jewish religion in France
pic related

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:39:08 No.50101897 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101786
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5wCl3aAMEQ

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:39:42 No.50101920 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50100140
/thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:41:16 No.50101993 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102221

>>50101836
>Except a lot of his military actions were preemptive.

You're talking bout Hitler, right?
Because the huge majority of wars Napoleon fought were the contrary of preemptive (the enemies were the ones to initiate the war)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:42:49 No.50102059 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102137 >>50102184

>>50101408
>French education

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:44:33 No.50102137 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102059
You aren't very bright are you ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:44:55 No.50102149 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102211 >>50102221

>>50101836
That could be said about Hitler too maybe. Some say it was actually a race between Hitler and Stalin on who could attack first.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:45:12 No.50102157 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102508 >>50104357

>>50101886
If he had knew the kikes were going to be responsible for his downfall, he'd have gassed them instead

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:45:27 No.50102167 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150

You can only judge great men by their long term impacts.

Napoleon can be thanked for spreading enlightenment thinking and values through Europe and peacefully (monetarily) giving Frances New World continental claims to America which is what let the US expand as rapidly as we did in the 19th century.

Hitler's actions on the other hand forever associated Nationalism with Racism and his poor management of WW2 left everything east of Berlin to be fugged by communism.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:45:41 No.50102175 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102296 >>50103394

>>50100689
It's just brit propaganda. I remember seeing an article on some britsharia online """newspaper""" attacking Napoleon's penis size.

They're still butthurt about Napoleon, even to this day.

>tfw no perfect world where Napoleon was emperor until his death
>no Emperor Maximilian in Mexico
>tfw Haitian revolution wasn't put down

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:45:57 No.50102184 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102059
>implying he was serious

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:46:25 No.50102211 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102149
There was no European conflict in ww2 where hitler did not strike first

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:46:40 No.50102221 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102149
>That could be said about Hitler too maybe

That could be said about Hitler only
See >>50101993
Out of 7 wars Napoleon fought as the leader of France, only 2 were started by him rather than his enemies

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:47:12 No.50102241 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098352

What's the point of idiots like you even bothering to 'contribute'?

Serbs = good
Croats = bad

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:48:22 No.50102296 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102524 >>50102840

>>50102175
You can always tell a non-white American poster based on his views on Britain. The rabid anti-brits tend to be nigger Obama supporters or Hispanics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:50:32 No.50102387 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101160

Thats kinda of what happened with Rome tbh.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:50:44 No.50102395 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102468 >>50103950

History is written by the victors.

And in the end Napoleon lost so he had to be the villain.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:52:13 No.50102468 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102563

>>50102395
He still won 6/8 wars

So He's a 6/8 good guy ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:52:44 No.50102498 Report Delete

Quoted By:

No, no. Would anyone aside from some brainwashed britcucks even argue about it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:52:55 No.50102508 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102157
>the jews
>not algerians
nice taqqia bibel

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:53:22 No.50102524 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102557 >>50102782

>>50102296
I don't like Obongo and I'm not a spic (or worse, a nigger). Also, fuck the britbongs.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Anglo.jpg, 34KiB, 397x359

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:53:54 No.50102557 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102524
Anglo scum is cancer

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:54:01 No.50102563 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102468
It's the last one that matters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:55:32 No.50102622 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50101786

Pretty shitty of us tbh but revolutionary france was too much of a cluster fuck to actually support and John Adams specifically stated that the US was not to get involved in foreign military affairs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:56:31 No.50102665 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102854

>>50101360

Washington wasn't beat because of British incompetence and his ability to keep an army together

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:59:00 No.50102782 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102524

No you aren't

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:59:54 No.50102840 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102296
>The rabid anti-brits tend to be nigger Obama supporters or Hispanics.

Or, you know, militant 'muh German heritage' fags.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:00:00 No.50102849 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50107470

>frogs claiming it was all defensive and Napoleon dindu nuffin
So once France had annexed huge amounts of land and taken over nearly all of Europe with puppet monarchs and states you think everyone should have been okay with eternal French domination of the continent and if you oppose it you are the warmonger?

You cannot allow one nation to dominate everyone else and if it does not willingly go back to its' own country then a rebellion of other powers is not aggression, it is actually the only thing preventing total domination by one country and culture over others.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:00:09 No.50102854 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50102914

>>50102665
But he was though. British land army troops were amateurs and volunteer kids on holiday for the summer. The only reason why you were different from the others was because you don't rely on naval trade that the British monopolised with their navy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:00:24 No.50102864 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50099821
Truly Brits are the jews of Europe

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:01:41 No.50102914 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102854

Kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:06:20 No.50103116 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50103416

Stephen Brumwell, author and specialist on eighteenth century North America, said: "Washington scores highly as an enemy of Britain on three key grounds: the immense scale of damage he inflicts upon Britain's Army and Empire – the most jarring defeat that either endured; his ability to not only provide inspirational battlefield leadership but to work with civilians who were crucial to sustain the war-effort; and the kind of man he was. As British officers conceded, he was a worthy opponent."

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:12:10 No.50103394 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102175
>caring about anything that happened in mexico, ever
obvious spic detected

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:12:41 No.50103416 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50103592

>>50103116

If you look at it from a position of territory lost then I guess the american revolution struck the heaviest blow to the british empire, but the war for independence really was piddle shit compared to WW1 and 2.

Hitler and the Kaiser are the only two contenders for worst foe to Britian tbh. Every other war, Seven Years war, Napoleonic Wars, Crimean war, was just the eternal Anglo off to the side taking minor loses while everyone else got fucked.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:12:49 No.50103423 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
>Among the main changes the French empire brought were the overhaul of administration, the changing of the schooling system – creating universities and making Slovene a learning language – and the usage of the Napoleonic code (the French Code Civil) and the Penal Code.

>Although the French did not entirely abolish the feudal system, their rule familiarized in more detail the inhabitants of the Illyrian Provinces with the achievements of the French revolution and with contemporary bourgeois society. They introduced equality before the law, compulsory military service and a uniform tax system, and also abolished certain tax privileges, introduced modern administration, separated powers between the state and the church (the introduction of the civil wedding, keeping civil registration of births etc.), and nationalized the judiciary. The occupants made all the citizens theoretically equal under the law for the first time.

Yeah what a bad guy

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:13:43 No.50103461 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50103498

>>50098150
nowhere near as relevant

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:14:41 No.50103498 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50103461
Mehmet pls

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:16:20 No.50103578 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50104299

If anyone's a bad guy, it's the empires that have existed throughout history, like the British, Roman, Mongol empires. All humans are bad, except the most aggressive, who control what you see and don't see, making themselves appear angelic and sinless, and others appear demonic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:16:45 No.50103592 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50103899

>>50103416

Britain won all those other wars, they didn't win the American revolution.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:19:34 No.50103725 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50104284

>>50101648
tbh France won those wars because they introduced new systems of mass conscription which allowed them to field hundreds of thousands of regular soldiers in an age of professional but small armies.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO revenge.jpg, 107KiB, 523x600

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:21:49 No.50103855 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Yes, he is comparable to Hitler. I'd even stipulate that Napoleon was reincarnated as Hitler, just so that he could - once again - doom this world to evil. Hell, Napoleon even gassed black people during the Haitian Revolution - but it is apparent that nobody cares about this marginalised group of people, instead, all attention goes to the Jews Hitler gassed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:22:01 No.50103865 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
Was Hitler a bad guy?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:22:43 No.50103899 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50106394

>>50103592

Britain arguably lost much more in WW1 what with the dissolving of the empire, not to mention the tremendous losses in human and material resources.

My votes for Kaiser Willy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:23:35 No.50103950 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102395
We learned in history that he is a good guy.

Probably best period in history after our kingdom got cucked.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:28:54 No.50104226 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098150
No, Hitler was elected

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:30:14 No.50104284 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50103725
No shit sherlock.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:30:28 No.50104299 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50104396

>>50103578
Canada wouldn't exist without the British Empire though fam

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2093482390.jpg, 172KiB, 700x979

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:31:24 No.50104357 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50104659

>>50102157
Napoleon was brought down by the landmass of Russia

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:32:09 No.50104396 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50104455

>>50104299
Yeah. It's kind of funny to see Hitler bashed when US/Canada sent Abos into extinction.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:33:35 No.50104455 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50104630 >>50104731

>>50104396
>when US/Canada sent Abos into extinction.
I know you guys up North have massive cases of white guilt but that was the Australians and British
I think you mean the Amerindians

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:36:53 No.50104630 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50104771

>>50104455
>American education

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:37:22 No.50104659 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50104357
He didn't expect them to torch Moscow to the ground

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO aboriginal definition.png, 14KiB, 504x81

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:38:56 No.50104731 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50104455
Yeah, that's what I meant. Same difference.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:39:43 No.50104771 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50104630
Last time I checked Aboriginals were from the continent of Australia
Hey paco maybe you shouldn't quit your job in the Home Depot parking lot

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:41:08 No.50104847 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50098255
corsica is french

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1430654299618.jpg, 47KiB, 240x250

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:44:32 No.50105016 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Fuck Napoleon. Nigger ruined everything.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:47:00 No.50105144 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50105247

>>50100548
Why couldn't they handle the bantz?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:49:05 No.50105247 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50105144
They were English and German, the two most humorless races of men on the planet.

Makes sense, The English are just Germans anyway.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:14:24 No.50106394 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50103899

Their empire grew after WW1

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:39:49 No.50107470 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50102849
>So once France had annexed huge amounts of land and taken over nearly all of Europe with puppet monarchs and states

This happened only because all Europe attacked us

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:44:19 No.50107661 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50107708

>>50100548
He wasn't alowbprn, his parents were part of the corsican aristocracy. He was educated in a military school which was reserved for people with 4 quarters of noble blood.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:45:27 No.50107708 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50107661
a low born*

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:49:19 No.50107863 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>50108188

He was worse for Switzerland. My grandfather guarded the border in ww2 and was a fraud the Germans would attack. But it didn't happen. Napoleon's army invaded Switzerland and they took treasurers and Napoleon demanded soldiers for his army. So Switzerland had to give him cannot fodder. He should been killed the first time they caught him.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO sw.png, 178KiB, 324x687

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:58:02 No.50108188 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>50107863
>Napoleon's army invaded Switzerland

Gee I wonder why
It's totally not because Russians and Austrians were attacking France from there due to you allowing them to
Involve yourself in shit, get hit

Subject

Name

E-mail

Password

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these boards

Your latest searches