When the Falklands was nearing it's end both El Salvador and Venezuela offered to send soldiers to help Argentina drive the british out, if Argentina had accepted that small war would have quickly turned into a large scale war, after all, military officers in Mexico and in other countries in Latin America were recruiting volunteers in case the british launched a large scale invasion of Argentina, and what would the US do? Stick it's nose where it don't belong again, the US thinks it can go wherever it wants and take whatever it wants & that nobody will ever be able to stop them, & in its arrogance thinks itself the good side, but that's all soon going to end!
UNASUR was created to destroy the u.s. in case it invades any of our Latin American countries again, & before you start talking about NATO, think about who's side China and Russia will be on? I can name several other countries who would join us! You really think that the american empire will last forever? Mexico defeated all invasions by the US the US will not defeat UNASUR, after all it can't even beat a few rebels in the middle east!
>The Sun has fallen out of orbit and is going to crash into the Earth. Humanity has randomly chosen people to enter an underground nuclear shelter with enough food and provisions for the next 50 years until the Earth is habitable again, luckily you were picked. >You are allowed to bring one rifle with you.
/k/ I need help. I'm in need of a shotgun. I have a JC Higgins model 20, but it's more of an heirloom bird gun. I need something for slugs, and buckshot. I've narrowed it down to 3 guns, all have their pros and cons. I just want a little input from you guys to push me in that right direction. The three guns are
Mossberg 500 series. Of all the three the ergonomics on this one are the best. Kind of an ugly gun, action is proven. Still in production, no shortage of parts.
Remington 870 Lol Cerberus. Ergonomics are bad, but capable of taking a pistol grip without ruining them like on the Mossberg. Same case as the Mossberg on the production and reliability.
Winchester 1300 No longer in production. Parts may be hard to come by. Probably the cheapest of the three, ergos aren't completely awful. In between the other two. The action is what drove me to this one. The rotating bolt and assisted opening make this gun a breeze to shoot.
I'm also open to other gun suggestions. Things like the Benelli supernova, or the FN police shotgun. Thank you all in advance. Shotgun general also, I guess.
electromagnetic projectile launchers require power and lots of space for batteries nuclear aircraft carriers have power and lots of space they don't fight directly though, so they don't need a rail gun "then how would they use that tech?" you might ask well, what do that launch? hurm... aircraft. duh. they've been using steam catapults since World War forever ago and that shit is archaic. steam? c'mon. who the fuck are we, Queen Victoria? America, being #1 at aircraft carriers, already has a design in the works it'll launch the jet at a hundred knots or so boring. we need to Tool Time that shit and add more power there isn't a single disadvantage to launching a fighter at mach speeds i dare you to post one
