>>27702146>Less capacityI could see this as a problem.
>harder to repair or maintain, harder to disassemble, harder to manufacture, less reliableLegitimately curious on these. Why is this? The mechanism looks pretty simple, both in how it works and in manufacturing of parts. Also having the weight further back on the rifle would make it less nose heavy, and the magazine isn't as exposed and easy to damage. Please, if someone has experience, or even has just read a bit on these I would really like to know.
