>>27704795>why did the USMC adopt the M45a1?They didn't. A small branch of a small task force of a USMC unit upgraded their older 1911s to this off-the-shelf model. A more appropriate question is "why did these people never leave the 1911 platform"?, which
>>27704816 >>27704825 address.
From this perspective your opening "so if the 1911 is considered outdated and unreliable" doesn't make sense, because it never stopped being the standard-issue sidearm. It's not like all of the remaining 1911s suddenly broke or turned into flintlock pistols.
>>27704955>Nobody ever called 1911s unrelibable.Ever?
>>27705071Why would that make a difference? It's a high-level policy decision, right?