>>27723399>I think it is a matter of time though.No it isn't. Look at Maoism and Vietnamese Communism as a good illustration, they both started out, in explicit, ideological terms, as internationalist communist movements but very quickly morphed into a traditional East Asian form of government, with a strong ethno-nationalist bent. Look at Japan, a virtual one-party state even if you bother to take the Diet into account (in reality Meiji-era descended bureaucrats run everything), look at Singapore, another one-party state in de facto terms.
Read some Lothrop Stoddard, he predicted all of this nearly a century ago. In fact, radical Islam has been on the rise for the past 5 decades, it hasn't been waning, there is no reason to expect Islamism to diminish, Islamism is the natural state of existence for most Arabs and always will be. Baathist attempts to wipe it out failed utterly, they were a historical piss in the wind.
Look at non-whites in the West, they're becoming more racially conscious. They just hide that racial consciousness behind postmodern language about "intersectionality" and so on. Moreover, the only group that really gives two fucks about racial universality (whites) are dying out and being reduced to minority status, and in doing so, being replaced in their own lands by groups who are vastly more tribally orientated.
