>>5120805>>5120827>>5120845There are religions that don't condemn LGBT folks, maybe give those a look? I mean, the Abrahamics are pretty much going to be your worst bets. Basically, the less a particular denomination sticks to the actual dogma derived from the books, the less hostile it will tend to be towards LGBT people. If you have to remain Christian there are plenty of very liberal churches with gay pastors and everything.
If nothing else, well, there's always UUs.
Or...
>>5120858...there's always this. Could try to accept that religions are, at best, a conglomerate of attempts at trying to explain life and the universe and shit pre-science, various local traditions and cultural weirdness, and attempts by some clever guys at trying to put their ideas of what beneficial order is on their populace.
At worst, just straight up farces intended to rule people with no regard to their actual benefit but rather the benefit of the ones making the rules.
Won't give you a deity to guide you, true, but it also means no fear of a ridiculously unwarranted eternal torment due to the creator being a jackass that likes to punish people after setting them up for failure.
Take your pic, Anon.
