Threads by creation - Page 12
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Stephen King is Cervantes compared with David Foster Wallace
Anonymous
I legit think King is a great writer. I scoffed at him forever, but I read his Children of the Corn story, and someone bought me Duma Key, and I had to admit he's solid. Not super-creative or some great literary writer, by any means, but solid enough in his own way.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301294 He writes entertaining and engaging fiction, the problem with it is that it isn't challenging and it lacks thematic depth. Still loved IT as a teenager, and I'd still probably like it now. He's excellent at what he does that' for certain.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The only book I've read of his was The Shining, and it was silly in a bad way.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Bloom really is a pretentious ass. His academic writing is largely just self-indulgent pap with an unhealthy dose of words like "phantasmagoric" thrown in to really emphasize the aesthetic bliss he claims to get from literature. He is totally blind to any constructive discussion of literature, instead preferring to just pointlessly call works "the GREAT American novel" &c. without actually developing on that point. Listen to one of his lectures. All he will do is talk about some undefinable element in a poem that gives him "pleasure", call himself an "old Gnostic", and slowly breath in the smell of his own farts.He's right about the school of resentment though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I would compare king more to charles dickens
Anonymous
Where do I commence?
Anonymous
Not worth the trip, he's worthless if you're not reading him in Russian. Even then, he's sprawling and poorly crafted, like a careless Dickens.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301281 Oi rudeboy shutup
>>7301272 The Raid
Or
The Death of Ivan Ilych
Maude Translation = Best Translation
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Initiate with Ivan Ilyich
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301272 The Cossacks
The Kreutzer Sonata (for 19th century /r9k/)
Hadji Murad
Anonymous
Deutsche Literatur Faden Was liest du? Auf Deutsch oder English? Wie gut kennst du Deutsch? Wer ist der beste Deutsch Schriftsteller?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301245 Gerade lese ich „Mein Katalonien” von George Orwell, werde es aber vermutlich heute oder morgen beenden. Danach werde ich beginnen, Franz Kafkas „Der Prozess” zu lesen.
Es scheint mir, als sprächest du kein muttersprachliches Deutsch? Was ist deine Muttersprache?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Ich lese ein Buch von Hans Bergel, "Der Tanz in Ketten", sehr gut bisher.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Tagebücher: 1909-1923, Franz Kafka Auffallend viele jüdische Theaterstücke, die jetzt komplett vergessen sind. Auch viele Motive in seinen Träumen die auch in seinem Werk auftauchen (viele Räume mit jeweils 2-3 Türen, z.B.)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Ich lese Bücher von David Foster Wallace. Er ist a sehr gut Schriftsteller.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Just finished reading this and I am mad. WHY THE FUCK DOES OAK MARRY THIS WHORE? She deserved all the suffering, it was her own doing. the only reasonable action for Oak was to tell her to go fuck herself.>They don't marry because she doesn't love him >Then he is poor >Yet she marries a soldier who is just as poor >Disregards Boldwood after getting his hopes up more than once >Goes back to Oak when she has no other options Is Bathsheba the biggest cunt in all of literature?
Anonymous
I was thinking about purchasing (pic related) book. Is it good?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301580 I don't think House of Leaves was a gimmick because it has quality that has affected many people and no way in hell it's a pleb tier but a literary masterpiece, SERIOUSLY! Also, this:
>>7301409 . Although I agree with 2666 being a good quality book too.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301200 It is good.
And it looks fucking good on my shelf.
Anonymous
>>7301326 Start with the Greeks
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7302263 >Shouldn't be /lit/ related or from sticky Read before you post, dammit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Topic derailed. Never heard of this book but sounds very gimmicky. Read If On A Winter's Night by Calvino if you haven't. It's kind of the same story and probably handled better. That being said, if you like these kinds of books, it's probably worth reading. That or Raw Shark Texts. I haven't read that one or House of Leaves since I was 16 either, and looking back at them now they seem really gimmicky, but whatever. It's a book. A book is kind of a gimmick anyway.
Anonymous
>oh man this is literally the greatest book of all time it's so deep >puns and fart humor I fucking hate all of you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301698 Dubliners is very conventional, and a bit boring aside from occasional good prose. If you don't care about Dublin and the time period you won't get much out of most stories.
Joyce has noticeably evolved in Portrait and experiments a bit more, but it's still almost normal and incomparably easier than Ulysses.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301199 Even if you don't like the book, you have to be a complete simpleton to not be able to recognize that there is something there.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301462 >"most difficult reads" I'm sorry, some of us here have an IQ in the triple digits.
Anonymous
Seriously, how do you Americans deal with such bad literature and try to make it pass as something different and edgy? It's just bad. The prose is horrible, the dialogue could be misplaced as being the product of a 15 year old high on weed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What the fuck are you talking about?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301198 get back to /b/ please. shitposting this hard wont ever fly in /lit/
Anonymous
So I've been analyzing /lit/ for quite sometime. Whatever you hacks write fits into one of these three categories. > pretentious You try too hard and use words you don't fully understand. Dictionary is your best friend, and that's not something to be proud of. You think you're deep and you think you've been influenced by some great authors and philosophers whom you've read thoroughly. You think you're a learned individual and have a formulated opinion, when in fact you're nothing but a thief.> boring You try to write in conversational style, stream your consciousness, and that just comes out boring. You write about shit nobody cares about, full of technical details or inside jokes. No emotion or passion. You have nothing to write about, because you haven't lived your life. > amateur You're just a talentless hack, writing at high school level. You're young and think you have some sort of innate talent that allows you to bypass years of honing your skill through hard work. There's a forth category and that's where you write about relevant, complex ideas in an accessible language with a distinct voice and style, without paraphrasing the classics. None of you are capable of reaching this god-tier. Tell me how I'm wrong.
Anonymous
>>7301184 >Dictionary is your best friend, and that's not something to be proud of. But why
Insomnia
>>7301557 Because if you write with a dictionary, the reader is going to have to read with one and that's not much fun. Sure, some people love learning new words, but they're in a minority.
Anonymous
>>7301557 If a word doesn't come to you naturally, it won't come naturally to your readers, either.
Also, you probably won't fully grasp its connotations and its impact within the sentence or the work as a whole.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301565 >>7301561 That makes sense, thanks.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I'm an amateur, and I'm training everyday. Even though my vocabulary isn't extensive, my writing isn't boring. I write weekly, and my friends notice that my prose gets better each time
Anonymous
so, if you were judging him, would you give him the sentencing he requested, or would you charge him on both counts? granted he used the manuscript as a defense
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301171 It's a subjective term, I suppose, but he's convinced you of this.
It is a sick fuck though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301171 he was a sociopath pedo and a murderer
o i forgot wat website i was on.
Anonymous
>>7301136 HOW DARE YOU BE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO WOMEN WHO HAVE REACHED THE AGE OF SEXUAL MATURITY
LIFE IN PRISON WITH NO PAROLE FOR YOU
but yea child rape is bad, but western cultures still allowed marriages with large age differences only up until about 100 years ago, hell i remember reading about a marriage between a 20 something guy and a 9 year old girl back in the 1930's, they had 8 kids and both lived together happily until they both died of old age in the late 1990's Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301214 i was talking about the murder..
and lolita wasnt fully developed yet
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I would disregard the manuscript because it's useless as evidence?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301129 it's always painfully obvious
>senior citizens >female Muslims >male asians >one white guy somewhere >a white and a black girl not just in this but in every thing released, its just too fucking obvious and not at all believable
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Racial and gender quality lit power rankings 1,White men 2.Asian men 3,any other man 4.a computer programmed to write books 5.A dog trained to put together simple sentences using blocks with words written on them 6.A women
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What a terrible list. Then again, they are new books, so I don't know what I was expecting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301129 he got quads man you already lost
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Sage and Hide All Click Bait Threads