Threads by latest replies - Page 18
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Shadow had done three years in prison. He was big enough, and looked don’t-fuck-with-me enough that his biggest problem was killing time. So he kept himself in shape, and taught himself coin tricks, and thought a lot about how much he loved his wife.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7300876 >until the other cons were too afraid to fuck with him. He went into prison with the others afraid to fuck with him.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7300931 Some is, some ain't. Generally, if the story isn't a single-issue, it's bad.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301628 Tell me - why does Shadow wear the mask?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301628 >He was a big guy. Anonymous
Anonymous
What are /lit/'s thoughts on him and his "philosophy" (anti-philosophy)? I'm currently 400 sections into the PI.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I'm only just getting into him, half way through Monk's bio. So far I'm pretty convinced he wasn't human.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7300883 the rationalists praise him because the rationalists are too dumb to face their misery. the empiricists look at him in thinking that he is the highest of the low.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I love Wittgenstein, but he wasn't that well read in philosophy in general. His personal philosophy murders shit philosophers, and shows them for the semantic-dependent frauds they are, but I don't think he understood the greats. Still, I invoke "meaning as use" all the time, because why wouldn't you? Witty shows you how to see through shit.
Anonymous
outdated
>PI § 246 In what sense are my sensations private? -- Well, only I can know whether I am really in pain; another person can only surmise it. -- In one way this is wrong, and in another nonsense. If we are using the word "to know" as it is normally used (and how else are we to use it?), then other people very often know when I am in pain. -- Yes, but all the same not with the certainty with which I know it myself! -- It can't be said of me at all (except perhaps as a joke) that I know I am in pain. What is it supposed to mean -- except perhaps that I am in pain?
Other people cannot be said to learn of my sensations only from my behavior -- for I cannot be said to learn of them. I have them.
The truth is: it makes sense to say about other people that they doubt whether I am in pain; but not to say it about myself."
http://www.dolosys.de/index-EN.htm >The Paintracker is a handy monitoring device to determine the analgesic depth needed for patients based on the pain reflex technique. The effects of pain therapy can therefore be measured using an objective parameter and concrete treatment recommendations can be derived from these measurements. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301603 I think this is a pretty clear case of wit being the one that is confused
confusing talk of pain with the actual felt sensation
it's bordering on behaviourism to be honest
>If we are using the word "to know" as it is normally used (and how else are we to use it? if he's so autistic about "to know" he could just use something like "to feel" or "to experience"
Anonymous
Wooow. The dog Tim Johnson represents Tom Robinson. That is so deep, truly one of the most linguistic and compelling stories of our time that should be required reading around the world. Bravo, Hemmingway.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301598 This book is written by Harper Lee, not Hemingway.
Anonymous
Why is there no God?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301547 /lit/ - literature
Anonymous
Quoted By:
There could be a God, depending on how you define it. There's almost certainly no God in the sense that Christianity and Islam conceive it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I used to be a real fedora tipper when i was younger, but i realized there could be a god, religions are man made though. And if there is a god, im going to punch him in the face if it has one.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301547 How do you know?
Anonymous
So I've been analyzing /lit/ for quite sometime. Whatever you hacks write fits into one of these three categories. > pretentious You try too hard and use words you don't fully understand. Dictionary is your best friend, and that's not something to be proud of. You think you're deep and you think you've been influenced by some great authors and philosophers whom you've read thoroughly. You think you're a learned individual and have a formulated opinion, when in fact you're nothing but a thief.> boring You try to write in conversational style, stream your consciousness, and that just comes out boring. You write about shit nobody cares about, full of technical details or inside jokes. No emotion or passion. You have nothing to write about, because you haven't lived your life. > amateur You're just a talentless hack, writing at high school level. You're young and think you have some sort of innate talent that allows you to bypass years of honing your skill through hard work. There's a forth category and that's where you write about relevant, complex ideas in an accessible language with a distinct voice and style, without paraphrasing the classics. None of you are capable of reaching this god-tier. Tell me how I'm wrong.
Anonymous
>>7301184 >Dictionary is your best friend, and that's not something to be proud of. But why
Insomnia
>>7301557 Because if you write with a dictionary, the reader is going to have to read with one and that's not much fun. Sure, some people love learning new words, but they're in a minority.
Anonymous
>>7301557 If a word doesn't come to you naturally, it won't come naturally to your readers, either.
Also, you probably won't fully grasp its connotations and its impact within the sentence or the work as a whole.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301565 >>7301561 That makes sense, thanks.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I'm an amateur, and I'm training everyday. Even though my vocabulary isn't extensive, my writing isn't boring. I write weekly, and my friends notice that my prose gets better each time
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>A mother let her child fall into the Nile. Still harping on the mother. A crocodile seized the child. Mother asked it back. Crocodile said all right if she told him what he was going to do with the child, eat it or not eat It >This mentality, Lepidus would say, is indeed bred out of your mud by the operation of your sun >And mine? Is it not too? Then into Nile mud with it! What did he mean by this?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Stephen King is Cervantes compared with David Foster Wallace
Anonymous
I legit think King is a great writer. I scoffed at him forever, but I read his Children of the Corn story, and someone bought me Duma Key, and I had to admit he's solid. Not super-creative or some great literary writer, by any means, but solid enough in his own way.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301294 He writes entertaining and engaging fiction, the problem with it is that it isn't challenging and it lacks thematic depth. Still loved IT as a teenager, and I'd still probably like it now. He's excellent at what he does that' for certain.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The only book I've read of his was The Shining, and it was silly in a bad way.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Bloom really is a pretentious ass. His academic writing is largely just self-indulgent pap with an unhealthy dose of words like "phantasmagoric" thrown in to really emphasize the aesthetic bliss he claims to get from literature. He is totally blind to any constructive discussion of literature, instead preferring to just pointlessly call works "the GREAT American novel" &c. without actually developing on that point. Listen to one of his lectures. All he will do is talk about some undefinable element in a poem that gives him "pleasure", call himself an "old Gnostic", and slowly breath in the smell of his own farts.He's right about the school of resentment though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I would compare king more to charles dickens
Anonymous
I've been searching for this book for more than 15 years, didn't even knew the name but I found it couple of months ago. Can't seem to find a pdf version :/.
Anonymous
Deutsche Literatur Faden Was liest du? Auf Deutsch oder English? Wie gut kennst du Deutsch? Wer ist der beste Deutsch Schriftsteller?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301245 Gerade lese ich „Mein Katalonien” von George Orwell, werde es aber vermutlich heute oder morgen beenden. Danach werde ich beginnen, Franz Kafkas „Der Prozess” zu lesen.
Es scheint mir, als sprächest du kein muttersprachliches Deutsch? Was ist deine Muttersprache?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Ich lese ein Buch von Hans Bergel, "Der Tanz in Ketten", sehr gut bisher.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Tagebücher: 1909-1923, Franz Kafka Auffallend viele jüdische Theaterstücke, die jetzt komplett vergessen sind. Auch viele Motive in seinen Träumen die auch in seinem Werk auftauchen (viele Räume mit jeweils 2-3 Türen, z.B.)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Ich lese Bücher von David Foster Wallace. Er ist a sehr gut Schriftsteller.
Anonymous
so, if you were judging him, would you give him the sentencing he requested, or would you charge him on both counts? granted he used the manuscript as a defense
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301171 It's a subjective term, I suppose, but he's convinced you of this.
It is a sick fuck though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301171 he was a sociopath pedo and a murderer
o i forgot wat website i was on.
Anonymous
>>7301136 HOW DARE YOU BE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO WOMEN WHO HAVE REACHED THE AGE OF SEXUAL MATURITY
LIFE IN PRISON WITH NO PAROLE FOR YOU
but yea child rape is bad, but western cultures still allowed marriages with large age differences only up until about 100 years ago, hell i remember reading about a marriage between a 20 something guy and a 9 year old girl back in the 1930's, they had 8 kids and both lived together happily until they both died of old age in the late 1990's Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>7301214 i was talking about the murder..
and lolita wasnt fully developed yet
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I would disregard the manuscript because it's useless as evidence?