[2 / 1 / ?]
Quoted By:
> Criticshave argued that Logical Positivism's insistence on thestrictadoption of theverifiability criterion of meaning(the requirement for a non-analytic, meaningful sentence to be eitherverifiableorfalsifiable) is problematic, as the criterion itself isunverifiable, especially for negative existential claims and positive universal claims.
Why not just proclaim a few axioms to get past this unverifiability problem?
Why not just proclaim a few axioms to get past this unverifiability problem?
