It's actionally rhe only biography l've read thus far, wo l don't really have anything to conpare ot again, but l really enjoyed it.
My only issue with it were the drawn-out battles, but that's probably just my fault for not being all that interested in military history.
>>7288648Quite the opposite, actually. Roberts states that his main reason for writing the book was just that false propaganda. He uses Napoleon's newly-released letters to paint a picture of a brilliant, but flawed man.
>>7288656Napoleon the Great has a much better cover, l wish l had paid thentwo extra euros for it. But yeah, it's the same book. Different page count though, that seems kinda strange.
