>>7298450tbh if you're intent on study, cambridge editions are always the way to go (as with kant and hegel(though all the translations of their collected works are still ongoing)), all other translations sacrifice original syntax and technical specificity for fluidity and intelligibility, whereas cambridge will no doubt be less "entertaining" but incredibly useful in terms of editorial content and pure accuracy
I've crossread their version of kant's critique against a few other translations, and their version of hegel's science of logic against miller's and fuark I now swear by cambridge
