>>7300725Generally speaking, areas of thought that have great deals of controversy are not controversial necessarily out of any real confusion (though being a confused intellect certainly helps in believing your own bullshit), but because because people have 'skin in the game'.
That is to say, its a question of ego and validation. People will naturally try to resist any inculcations that they are not what they are cracked up to be, and hence will throw their how heart and soul into frustrating any theories or sentiments that could imply that, against all reason.
In this, they find natural allies of persons with deep feelings of insecurity, who bristle at the phenomena of judgment whatsoever, and who then constitute much of the grist for the mill of such 'controversy'.
