>>7301537Pretty good. Rhythmically it's a bit lacking, but it's not too much of a fault since Woolf sacrifices in that department to better portray the cadence and stop-and-go dissonance of genuine human thought, and the passages that are instead focused on painting the scenery are consistently beautiful. I've always found the style and description in those parts 'swirly,' like a gust of wind dancing around the room, depicting one part at a time until you have the full picture. Fits very well with the themes of time (her descriptions are cinematic---lots of pausing to capture single, vivid frames, letting you reflect like on a painting, then it resumes again) and atmosphere-of-life.
There's plenty of say about the excellently done character relationships too, but those have been the least interesting part of the novel to me even since my first read-through.
