>>25177789>If you're being called out on these, take your own adviceI have very few fetishes and they never appear here, so this doesn't apply. Incidentally, I seldom criticize candid disapproval or criticism.
But in the paragraph above, you're referring to what I'm doing right now, I believe. It doesn't make sense unless you generalize my advice beyond what I intended. I'm criticizing attempts at moderating *content*, especially the ineffectual, repetitive ones, i.e. shitposting, like the one that started this, the formulaic "go to <irrelevant thread>, cuck". I'm, on the other hand, guilty of metadiscussion, a different kind of shitposting. You may call me a hypocrite and I may as well be one, but a hypocrite can still have a point. I hope you realize that if I'd adhered to your interpretation, I would not have been able to express that point. Your reasoning precludes an entire class of views from being expressed.
>By the way, we had diapers and undeleted flashfaggotry in the last threadI grant you the former, but I found only two flashposts and both are deleted. Even the one that was clearly facetious. You can't even use Flash in a joke here without risking its deletion. That's really sad. I don't like Flash, by the way. Just saying, in case you decide to somehow use this against me.