>>25230771you're a different anon, aren't you
nvm I'll play along, the original guy deserves any ridicule he gets anyway
IQ tests measure a very narrow set of skills which are easy to test for but not necessarily indicative of what people in the real world would define as "intelligence." in fact its really hard to define what "intelligence" really is because human beings aren't computers and its not as simple as "faster processor = more smarter." while there's definitely a correlation between a high IQ score and being "smarter" in real-world terms, it is not so firm a correlation that any given person with a high IQ can be assumed to be smarter than a person with an average one.
you are not a genius. there was a time when people thought that you could determine whether someone was a "genius" with a simple test, but that has gone out of vogue as it became clear that doing so would make the term "genius" functionally meaningless. a lot of people (probably the majority of people) with IQs that would have been defined as "genius-level" do not contribute in any significant way to the collective knowledge or culture of mankind. they're more likely to be successful in life than people with low IQs, but they don't accomplish very many notable things.
being proud of having a high IQ is like being proud of being tall, in that its not something you've earned, its just a circumstance of your genetics and your environment. except being tall at least has the definitive practical advantage of letting you reach things that are on high shelves.
finally, if you took your IQ test online (which is the case for most internet "geniuses") then I strongly recommend that you go get officially tested at a counseling center or university or something. prepare to be disillusioned.
>captcha: select all the drinks>apparently ketchup is a drink 
