>>13757315I know... It's terrible... Very slow. Definitely anything is better... What a faggot you are.
>>13757390>>13757280OP, lesson 1. Don't ask /o/ for an opinion, they will just relay whatever thing they hear without actually owning or driving it.
You must ask specifically the owners of such cars (like me). But please refer to
>>13757472This topic has been covered. Long story short. Avoid 1st gens if you don't know why they are cheap. 2, they are amazing cars and pretty much handle 700hp with stock internals. 3 weight reduction is fairly easy, at least the weight would go to 1600kg.
If considering a non turbo, they are goat tier DDs. Reliable, sexy as fuck and fairly quick.