So I'm part of a class on race at my university, you can all imagine what it's like.

I have a couple of questions I'd like to ask you fine ladies, gentleman, and other beings in regards to racism (more specifically racism in America, although obviously all perspectives from all countries all welcome to chime in).

Why do we value the experiences of the victim (of racism) more than logic? Why is it that we value experience over fact?

If we assume that privilege (the "liberal" definition of privelege) exists, why is it that we are told that there is only one way to assert that privilege positively? Often I've been told that as a white male I should specifically be asserting my privilege as a white male to help African-Americans. Why is it that that is the only under-privileged that I should be asserting my privilege to help?

I have often heard that "color blindness" is not the solution to racism. Exactly why isn't it the solution? Isn't not judging people on race exactly what we seek to accomplish by abolishing racism?

Thanks for your time. It's hard for me to bring these up in my actual course as most of my fellow students are retarded cucks who will just parrot precisely what our overly leftist professor and what our overly leftist material states and any time I tend to bring up any point that seeks to reject it (not all of it necessarily) it's immediately dismissed. And actually, while I'm thinking about it, why is it that most people trying to abolish racism aren't willing to take the time and really discuss differing opinions?