>>54713463>again, dismissive, and circular logic.Nothing about that is circular. A miserable person will probably remain miserable. You don't keep them miserable, they were that to begin with, independent of you, and if you let them, they'll only make you miseable as well, because it's fruitless effort.
>yes, they do. always.Proof?
>simplistic and naive worldviewWhat, saying that bad parents raise bad children is " simplicistic and naive" ?
> and also circular logic You really like that expression, hm?
>(and victim blaming)Literally what
> but what about divorces that don't involve dicks?Yes, I addressed those earlier. Those tend to be far less damaging, or sometimes not at all.
>good parents stay together. if they stay together, they're good parents.If you hadn't abridged my quote, you'd already have realized that this isn't what I'm arguing at all. Read properly, instead of just skipping over it and assuming it says what you think it does.
Now, apparently I have to explain all concepts from the start, because you've been raised without a concept of what constitutes bad parents or bad people, and that's sad.
Bad parents are the kind that doesn't take time for their children, that's too selfish to care much, that bothers their children with their interpersonal drama, that doesn't give them the options they should have, that doesn't instill their children with a sense of values and of fitting into society.
Are we clear on that? Do you also see how those bad parents would likely not get along with a spouse in the long run, and how they would produce failed children, regardless of marriage status?
>there are lots of problems. but what you're talking about is literally totalitarian.No, it's not. Totalitarian is by definition state action. Society controlling itself isn't. Society controlling itself means you are still allowed to be a dick. You'll just notice no one wants anything to do with you anymore, i.e. society shows you the door.
