>>54720195>common knowledgeFine, here we go then:
>milk is reheatedPasteurizing milk prevents you from contracting listeria and tuberculosis, which was very common prior to the introduction of the practice. Furthermore there is zero evidence that pasteurization affects the nutritional quality of the milk.
>cows are pumped with medication and don't move much, but sit in darknessFactory farming does not effect nutritional quality of meat; this is a scare tactic devised by vegetarian/animal rights groups. The greatest danger of factory farming is the overuse of antibiotics, which is producing resistant strains of bacteria. Furthermore, cattle in any cold climate have always spent several months of each year in a barn, usually right before slaughter.
>those chicken, who are genetically modifiedGenetic modification (which do not exist for chicken, fyi) do not effect nutritional quality. In reality however, chickens have been bred to be larger than they formerly were, not "genetically modified". And again, growth hormones and antibiotics do not actually effect nutritional value.
>Meat is also painted to look more red,Prior to the practice of meat dying, meat was smoked or salted to increase longevity, two processes linked to bowel cancer.
>so is breadNo bread is not painted (jesus christ) and the preservatives are cooked into it, not "dipped" in. Furthermore, sensible people buy bread from bakeries.
>fruit is also full of chemicalsInsecticides sprayed on the outside of fruit are washed off during the picking process, no chemicals are injected into fruit (or whatever you imagine). Most types of fruit are not gentically modified and genetic modifications do not effect nutrition. Furthermore most fruit is not grown hydroponically and greenhouse fruit is identical to field fruit, anyway.
