>>54737901>Some criticisms have focused on the limited number of studies upon which the book is based. The IQ figure is based on one study in 34 nations, and two studies in 30 nations. There were actual tests for IQ in 81 nations. For 104 nations there were no IQ studies at all and IQ was estimated based on IQ in surrounding nations.[2] The limited number of participants in some studies has also been criticized. A test of 108 9- to 15-year-olds in Barbados, of 50 13- to 16-year-olds in Colombia, of 104 5- to 17-year-olds in Ecuador, of 129 6- to 12-year-olds in Egypt, and of 48 10- to 14-year-olds in Equatorial Guinea, all were taken as measures of national IQ.[3]solid scientific work
seriously, to get a statistically valid estimation of a country's iq you'd need a pretty large and representative group. and then there's like 80 countries tested, so two fags without any outside support could not possibly fund that.
imagine if they went to usa, paid like $20 to the first 100 people that agree for an iq test (probably unemployed, possibly blacks), and claimed this is a statistically significant experiment.
