/pol/ - Politically Incorrect » Thread #54739870

[11 / 2 / ?]

Is the Wall Street Journal redpilled?

Anonymous ID:bNXXlbGY Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:13:25 No.54739870 View Reply Report Delete

Quoted By: >>54740776 >>54740902 >>54740930 >>54740955 >>54741056

I've been reading articles from the WSJ, and they seem to be pretty redpilled when it comes to economics. Many of the articles favor free market capitalism, and show their disdain for big government and the liberals that are promoting it. Do you read the WSJ /pol/? If you do, what do you think of it?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:6rohKPTw Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:14:30 No.54739921 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>54740388

its generally considered to be right-leaning, although i wouldnt call it in any way biased.

jew york times is a different story though

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:bNXXlbGY Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:23:21 No.54740388 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>54739921
They definitely don't seem to be biased. They always present the facts, and then make their opinion based on them.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:+MQe8xUc Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:27:14 No.54740597 Report Delete

Quoted By:

It's a neo-liberal anglo imperialist magazine, that is OK with any social degeneracy.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:2QXTdzOW Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:29:39 No.54740721 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>54741104

economics is redpilled anyone who studies it will be redpilled.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:fAc26o9Z Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:30:43 No.54740776 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>54739870
It's owned by Newscorp. That should answer your question.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:N6i28tIK Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:32:55 No.54740902 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>54739870

The WSJ is the closest thing to an unbiased American newspaper in 2015.

Rupert Murdoch bought them for $500 million or so as something of a retirement present for himself, because he loves newspapers, is rich as hell, and is running out of fucks to give.

Thus, they're one of the only newspapers that isn't desperately clinging to life, and can afford to finance real coverage. That being said, they lean right and are more likely to get someone like Karl Rove to editorialize on elections than James Carville.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:CSl/tMl0 Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:33:20 No.54740930 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>54739870
>free-market capitalism
>redpilled
lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:0mZ4AClZ Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:33:43 No.54740955 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>54739870
They're establishment cucks

derp_commander [Socialist Front] !!SSXdvR3LCoa

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO photo1435181204279.png, 322KiB, 480x480

derp_commander [Socialist Front] !!SSXdvR3LCoa ID:Q0eJ5MlN Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:35:36 No.54741056 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>54739870
The WSJ is a ruling class paper. The ruling class have no reason to lie to themselves. Fortune, Forbes, and Bloomberg are also good sources. Of course they support free-market capitalism: that's what benefits them, so just keep that in mind.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:+MQe8xUc Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:36:24 No.54741104 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>54740721
>vodoo-tier prediction on the future are redpilled

You just described marxism.

Subject

Name

E-mail

Password

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these boards

Your latest searches

Is the Wall Street Journal redpilled?