>>7615591no, i think human-level AI is at least theoretically possible, since at least we exist as an instantiation of it, but
a.) we are still quite far from it and
b.) the perceived usefulness of such a system in creating an even MORE intelligent system is VASTLY overstated
i have seen no empirical evidence to suggest that superintelligent god AI is possible, nor is our understanding of the brain and how it produces intelligence good enough to show that it is at least theoretically possible that such an entity can exist.
>>7615653you have NO IDEA how many genuinely bright and intelligent people at universities around the world (MIT foremost among them) believed that human-level AI would be achieved in only 15 years... in 1960.
