>>7615809So why didn't he address the issue in the OP pic? Cause he knows what he's talking about?
>>7615813>Shut the FUCK up about "principles of logic" and "logical statements" already, no one gives a shit that you're seeing logic in your fucking highschool class just now.It's hilarious though, people become professors and whatnot and forget what the fuck they learned in the beginning. Try to read the sentence slowly (and maybe actually read the OP pic)
The veracity of the axioms does not negate the truth of the theorems.
This why I keep referring to basic logic because you don't seem to understand any of it. The theorems are statements, and neither the veracity of the antecedent (the axiom in this case) or the consequent alone determine the truth of the theorem.
>This is not about belief.Yet you keep arguing about whether or not our axioms are good, but the axioms by definition are beliefs, they don't follow from anything else.
btw are you autberger himself? If so I have spent years laughing at your dumbass and so has the rest of youtube and /sci/ keep doing what your doing fam.
>>7615820All of that is great anon, but to go so far as to deny the existence of real numbers because you don't think our axioms are "correct" is fucking amateurish. There's no theorem that says "The real numbers exist." Almost all theorems go "IF such and such THEN this and that."
>>7615828actually im enjoying my pic related tonight
