/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #7621807

[14 / 4 / ?]

206KiB, 360x360, Sincfunktion.gif

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

ITT: /sci/porn

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 16:30:33 No.7621807 View Reply Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7621828 >>7624805

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 16:34:14 No.7621820 Report Delete

Quoted By:

l-lewd

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 16:39:26 No.7621828 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7621853

>>7621807
you have the equation as sin(x/epsilon)/(pi*x) but epsilon is listed at the top as its reciprocal and it pisses me the fuck off

this is now a /sci/rage thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 16:45:06 No.7621840 Report Delete

Quoted By:

I kek'd

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 16:53:26 No.7621853 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7621917 >>7622199

>>7621828
are you stupid or something?

you can't even autism.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 17:20:54 No.7621917 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7621853
so you're as stupid as OP
I wish you kids would just stay on /b/ instead of shitting up /sci/ for the rest of us

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 19:37:19 No.7622199 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7622241 >>7623475 >>7623497

>>7621853
no, he’s right. it could either be x/ε and ε=1, 2, 3…
or x*ε with ε=1/n where n=1, 2, 3...
that or the frequency should decrease instead of increasing

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 20:01:50 No.7622241 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7622275

>>7622199
Nope. Sin((n+1)x) has a greater frequency than Sin(nx) for all natural n.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 20:12:57 No.7622275 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>7622286

>>7622241
oh I see
you're trolling because I said this is now a rage thread

you really are a total fucking loser

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO bait.png, 65KiB, 625x626

Anonymous Wed 28 Oct 2015 20:17:46 No.7622286 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7622275

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 29 Oct 2015 05:44:13 No.7623475 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7622199
epsilon in the equation is the angular wavelength buddy, it's supposed to decrease

H Thu 29 Oct 2015 06:21:44 No.7623497 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7622199
No, because they're taking the $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$ limit. Epsilon is ALWAYS used to represent a number approaching zero.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1439712327814.gif, 150KiB, 160x120

Anonymous Thu 29 Oct 2015 20:08:59 No.7624805 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>7621807

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1439928049791.gif, 49KiB, 673x480

Anonymous Thu 29 Oct 2015 20:14:22 No.7624821 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Subject

Name

E-mail

Password

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these boards

Your latest searches

ITT: /sci/porn