>>7623094Uhh... Protip: the wave interpretation is actually correct. Particles are so 50 years ago. Welcome to quantum field theory.
Ex:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vrs-Azp0i3kThe simplest and most straightforward way to talk about the math is that the world as we know it is composed of infinitely divisible (or maybe planck divisible) quantum vector fields that have certain couplings and which evolve randomly according to the Shrodinger wave equation. That's the simplest explanation conceptually with the fewest moving parts and the fewest conjectures which also happens to fit the facts.
>>7623093Mmm..
But as Mayuri says in a better translation:
The perfect being, was it?
There is no such thing as perfect in this world.
That may sound cliche, but it’s the truth.
The average person admires perfection and seeks to obtain it.
But, what is the point of achieving perfection?
There is none. Nothing. Not a single thing.
I loathe perfection!
If something is perfect, then there is nothing left.
There is no room for imagination.
No place left for a person to gain additional knowledge or abilities.
Do you know what that means?
For scientists such as ourselves, perfection only brings despair.
It is our job to create things more wonderful than anything before them, but never to obtain perfection.
A scientist must be a person who finds ecstasy while suffering from that antinomy.
In short, the moment that foolishness left your mouth and reached my ears, you had already lost.
Of course, that’s assuming you are a scientist.
