>>7625303not /x/ at all, this is the kind of thing "simultaneous" time implies.
What you have just tapped into is our notion of "number theory" where each consecutive value denotes some relationship therein to the prior value or values.
A is a 1 which can be minute or expanse as identity.
2 a combination of the efforts described by 1 or B
3 is a prime state, or a particular "do" variant with bindings to the identity state and it's descript place in the combination evaluated prior or C
4 being an expanse case alloted a more concentrated effort made fruitful by the gestures one can purport or portend to the measures described in the identity case to be complicit with the actions described here. Here having all prior notions carry as you described here:
>hhmmm, well I would argue that A-> {~} ->D could make the case for a form of telekinesis in where the place in question is in suspension of C->B where D is delegating B as a subset of A, this is assuming we're functioning on [primes] and that the segues of existance are functioning compromises of each other and not fracturingsjust with a slight tinge because, to me anyway, absolutes describes a relationship to a natural state that is being deferred for ease of compartmentalization but not allowing for cases in retrieval as if by some irrational nature this was appointed and not endowed by virtue/grace, considering we are describing segues of existence as functioning compromises..
It isn't paranormal, not really, it's just not glyphic. What can be said about it is that much like the diferential states of some or a product value the order here is described by the means to both transference and continuity.
This is why we use the square root of some value to account for a compacted/compressed state of the same thing and a minimizing measure through which one can portend a similar relationship as a sound "implication".given that the original state is indeed prime. I believe this is the basis to encryption.
