>>7625102>No. Freud is psychoanalysis. Jung is analytical psychology. Adler, who shared ideological grounds with each, called his particular brand of nonsense "individual psychology"All of these are psychoanalysis and have nothing to do with contemporary psychology.
>You took psych 101 and you remember a bit of freudThe only thing they'll teach you about Freud in psych 101 is that he's wrong.
>>7625114No, I'm not.
Psychotherapy usually doesn't use anima or id, these days it's all CBT, which is the opposite of psychoanalysis.
There's also a bit of psychodynamic therapy, which inherits from psychoanalysis, but doesn't use these terms either.
>>7625124>Your argument is essentially "You can never be really sure of anything, man"You can be sure of mathematical proofs and analytical statements.
In this world of matter though, 6 sigma is all you're gonna get.
>Why are YOU talking about psychoanalysis?Because
>>>id, ego, self, anima, animus, shadow, projection, reflection, ect.are psychoanalytic terms and have nothing to do with contemporary psychology.
