/sp/ - Sports » Thread #63175020

[28 / 2 / ?]

128KiB, 640x673, ayy.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:42:22 No.63175020 View Reply Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175123 >>63176710

>fanduel

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1431286239990.jpg, 907KiB, 4500x4334

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:46:51 No.63175123 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63175020

sounds good man

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:57:20 No.63175337 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175376

This is the shit that happens when gambling is illegal in your country.

'Land of the free' they said.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:57:56 No.63175348 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175459

"Garcon means boy"

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 16:59:15 No.63175376 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175637

>>63175337
This has nothing to do with gambling, retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:03:01 No.63175459 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63175348

thank you for the info oh educated one

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:03:46 No.63175475 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175514

The players will lose, they're just hoping memeduel will give them some hush money to go away. There was already a case that established using player names and results for fantasy games is legal as stats are viewed as simply facts, and therefore have no protection.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:05:24 No.63175514 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175600

>>63175475
>the players will lose
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/michael-jordan-awarded-8-9m-grocery-store-article-1.2333917

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:06:13 No.63175540 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>Only suing because NFL promotes Draftkings
>They want that ad money bling bling
>if fanduel coughed up AD money(bling bling) there would be no lawsuit

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:08:32 No.63175600 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175678 >>63176594

>>63175514
using someone's name in an ad =/= using their name in a fantasy game

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:09:49 No.63175637 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63175827

>>63175376

of course it does. This fanduel crap would be irrelevant if you had gambling

Festus_EzELITE !!KhHG6+p3StV

Festus_EzELITE !!KhHG6+p3StV Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:11:56 No.63175678 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63176379

>>63175600

both are to ultimately make money, though

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:17:36 No.63175827 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63175637
>being retarded
Even if gambling were legal, that doesn't change the likeness lawsuit, which is what this suit is about, retard.

And gambling is all over America. It's just confined to reservations

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:42:50 No.63176379 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63175678
one has ultimately been decided to be legal, though

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:51:23 No.63176594 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63175600
Isn't the issue that the players names come up in the Fanduel ads? If they didn't show fantasy team rosters, then they could get away with it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:56:25 No.63176710 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63177414

>>63175020
>Garcon
>Good in fantasy

top fucking kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 17:58:53 No.63176761 Report Delete

Quoted By:

"Pierre Garcon is not relevant in this league."

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:00:58 No.63176799 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63176907 >>63177538

How is DFS any different than ESPN or Yahoo using their names?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:06:18 No.63176907 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63176799
It isn't, which is why this lawsuit will never work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:43:01 No.63177414 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63176710
He's decent for my 16 team league but not much else

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:46:58 No.63177471 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>heralded

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 18:51:42 No.63177538 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63177647

>>63176799

Different because there is no fees, winnings, aka not gambling. I don't think the players will win this case, but at the same time I didn't think Brady would win his case either so who knows.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 19:00:03 No.63177647 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63177697

>>63177538
you didnt think brady would win? are you retarded? the nfl fucked up all over the place

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 19:03:25 No.63177697 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63178430 >>63179280

>>63177647
He cheated though

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 19:41:44 No.63178430 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63177697
OJ murdered a dude and that had even more evidence bruh

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 20:15:54 No.63179280 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63179496

>>63177697
roger godell hired a private investigator who had previously worked with the nfl, on the behalf of the nfl. if you want to try to find evidence on someone you cant hire someone who has affiliations or common interest with you. thats why the court threw it out.

but you knew all that right? right? please?

goodells a joke

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 20:23:29 No.63179496 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>63180208

>>63179280
>if you want to try to find evidence on someone you cant hire someone who has affiliations or common interest with you

>employ
>affiliation

>pay
>common interest

I don't know the case, but I do know that hiring somebody you know does not violate independence. What did he do at the NFL that created a conflict of interest?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 30 Oct 2015 20:45:40 No.63180208 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>63179496
from wikipedia

>In November 2013, the National Football League hired Wells to prepare a report on a bullying incident with the Miami Dolphins involving Richie Incognito.[11] The report, released on February 14, 2014, made headlines for its finding of "a pattern of harassment"

>In 2015, Ted Wells was again hired by the NFL, this time to investigate the New England Patriots' alleged "Deflategate" infractions. His report concluded that it was "more probable than not" that Tom Brady was "generally aware" of tampering with NFL game footballs during the 2015 AFC Championship Game. Ted Wells's independence and impartiality has been called into question in the wake of the report because of his extensive prior business relations with the NFL, his use of a scientific consultancy with a reputation for questionable client-serving results,[13] and because of his track-record of success exculpating high-profile clients and corporations during public scandals.[14] Eventually, Judge Richard Berman overturned Tom Brady's suspension in the Deflategate saga that had been based on Wells's report.

the courts didnt label tom brady guilty or innocent. it was the legitimacy of the wells report that was the main focus. the wells report was fucking stupid in the first place and was absolutely no grounds to suspend someone

Subject

Name

E-mail

Password

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these boards

Your latest searches