>>1886194>The focus in the part that mentioned Ucchi is that they happened to wear dresses that were alikeThat's what the whole context with the picture was, until...
>Could have been a different brand. Plain dresses are common. Design looks tad different and Mimo's blog said nothing about it either.Referring to Ucchi's, which wasn't written on Mimo's blog.
>Except she did? Unless snidel have made other such dresses.???? Well?
----
>The way >>1886174 had come across made it somewhat confusing what you were sayingReferred to
>This coming from Ucchi, on the other hand, is a tad surprising. What I get from reading that twice, it's either
>Anon implied Ucchi bought one for this futago koude purpose>Implying the product is the same makers and price> So it therefore begets the question of when and how they both would own>Mimo just got hers'>Dunno Ucchi, does "When" or "How" matters when it could have been in past or recent.---
To be fair, if I have to assume, it would NOT be coincidental, but it could have been. It's not like it's unrealistic for it to be a coincidence.
These seiyuss are cute w/ their similar fashion. That's that.
I wouldn't rather go that far and assume something which had a lot of different possibilities, like how or when they got their knit dresses, or implying Ucchi did "This" or "That" when it could have been something else
Yes, this is /u/Yuri. We ships, we pairs, we discuss
, some shitpost and shipfagging, but far stretched assumptions with multi-possibilities are something else
