>>1902514As far as I can remember, no "joke" like that has been made on lok/u/. We like our suffering here, but there's specific aim and direction to it, not just stupid "they die and everybody is miserable anyways, haha!" So yeah, I read that as very obviously a /co/tard. And it doesn't change the fact that the response to the initial replies to the troll was more of an overreaction. Besides, my reaction was "go away." Hardly as hysterical as you're making it out to be. The other nee-chan was a bit more touchy, sure.
Huh. Maybe it was Concerned, trying to throw us off his scent by not even bothering to feign as a fan, and instead trying to disguise himself in badly conceived suffering.
See, /that's/ paranoid.
>Also post yfw both posts you're replying to are meDon't see the issue. It is entirely plausible to agree with a person on one thing and not another.
