>>314881513>What's not feminine about it? Because her skin and features aren't exposed?>Or do you mean her body isn't feminine enough?It's not feminine clothing. The cut of Victorian clothing for men is similar. The fashions often had a narrower waist for men. Plus the half-cape thing on her shoulder does nothing but make her shoulders bigger. The same with her raised collar. The entire lower half of her body could belong to a man.
The only thing that is feminine is the swell of her breast, slightly larger hips and the corset style thing on the back of her coat, which makes zero sense.
Her garments look like men's clothing that has been modified to suggest femininity. Overall it fails. It's not sexy. You can't even see her face or hair. Overall she's just wearing an outfit that is no sexier than a male assassin's outfight but has less practical additions to it.
