>>314803103>but hes not going to create the perfect utopia anonHe's a permanently mummified guy in a computer system, there's not much else he can do. Go riding out on wars? Eat a lot? Fuck bitches? No no and no.
Plus unlike most monarchies you don't have to worry about the chance of the heir being a fuckwit. With Caesar, NCR or Yes Man, you have absolutely no clue who's coming next if the person/s you pick to rule kick the bucket. With House, you know that House is going to be running the strip for maybe thousands of years more.
>>314803637>he's a bit out of touch with the world at large>a House-ruled Vegas MIGHT not be as super as House thinks it will beBut these are extremely vague reasons here.
Siding with Caesar comes with extremely high risk of destabilization after the Kaiser kicks the bucket, plus considerable human rights issues that happen in the Legion, plus the stupid notech rule.
Siding with NCR comes with knowledge that the government is and will continue to be corrupt, and have difficulty doing anything due to the internal fighting that comes with any democracy.
Yes Man option is a wild card. You either get the player roleplaying as a tyrant cannibal or the friendly enlightened benevolent guy.
The very worst you can give House is that he would be conservative and return Vegas to the pre-War era and keep it there, and that's not even explicitly stated. Compared to the other options, and the standard of living pre-War entails, that sounds fucking amazing.
