/vg/ - Video Game Generals » Thread #120161863

>>120168745
Leddit is the only place I draw a line.

I THINK I've been on it a few times, when googling fixes for certain problems, but every time the interface looked different so I'm not sure. I have no interest in ever going to that place.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:38:38 No.120168883 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169045 >>120169098

>>120161863
shit I missed you're thread and make another one >>120163385

please use lowercase /scg/ in the future

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:41:56 No.120169045 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169260

>>120168883
Search better in the future? Who the fuck searches case sensitive for this shit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:43:00 No.120169098 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120168883
i search "citizen" if i dont find it 1st time

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO filters.jpg, 185KiB, 1119x550

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:46:32 No.120169260 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169334

>>120169045
the filters are case sensitive

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:48:10 No.120169334 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169417 >>120169669

>>120169260
Fine.

Who the fuck uses case sensitive filters for this shit? Even bigger retards than the people who searches for case sensitive shit is who.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:49:55 No.120169417 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169489

>>120169334
if I type "4" into my search bar it suggests "4chan.org/vg/scg";, thats just how I get here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:51:25 No.120169489 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169560

>>120169417
And that searches for scg case insensitive for me, so I don't see the problem with that specifically.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:52:42 No.120169560 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169731

>>120169489
Yeah, I wasn't complaining. If some other people's ways of getting to the board involve case sensitive, then I can see why they would be pissed.

OP definitely got it wrong, why the fuck would you even make those letters capital, general names are like fake board names, that's like typing /B/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:52:54 No.120169578 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169651 >>120169720

Might have to redo the AC FAQ, and I might do a little getting started flight guide. Some of it doesn't even work anymore.

Maybe a video or two for basic shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:54:13 No.120169651 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120169578
And maybe tell everyone to play through the fucking training once.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO filters2.jpg, 68KiB, 1059x521

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:54:28 No.120169669 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169731

>>120169334
it's not like I created them, they're the default 4chan shit. Sure, I screwed up and should have bothered to press ctrl+f but is sticking to the convention too much to ask? It was always lowercase, all the other threads have it in lowercase.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:55:26 No.120169720 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120169578
Good on you, do that shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:55:44 No.120169731 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120169806

>>120169560
It's pretty stupid to make it /SCG/, but complaining because you only search for /scg/ is stupid as well. There've been plenty of threads that didn't have /scg/ in it anyway, just broaden the search a little bit.
>>120169669
You choose to use them. Like I said, plenty of reasons to not use such a limited search.

>It was always lowercase
Most of the time, yeah. But definitely not always.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 08:57:19 No.120169806 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120169731
Well yeah, putting /SCG/ is just being a retarded OP. This isn't new information this is how it's been ever since generals with that naming convention existed on 4chan.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 14457624824.png, 583KiB, 947x494

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 09:25:53 No.120171282 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120171394 >>120171802

>>120167131

How do they explain the 80's look in lore?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 09:27:37 No.120171394 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120171575

>>120171282
Those things were shitty cheap industrial prefabs that were made on a MASSIVE SCALE at one point. We are talking Ikea space stations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 09:30:40 No.120171575 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120171669

>>120171394

That makes sense, I guess.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 09:32:27 No.120171669 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120178576

>>120171575
It was a pretty cool piece of lore. If I recall correctly that was in Humanity's fastest period of expansion, then there was a bit of a crash, and they are obviously way too thinly spread now and have been for a long time.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO CIG streachgoal rewards.jpg, 334KiB, 1632x918

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 09:34:25 No.120171802 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120173583 >>120258376

>>120171282
Why was Chris so nervous about cutting the cake?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO soooooon.png, 90KiB, 415x212

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 09:41:08 No.120172195 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120172347

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 09:43:46 No.120172347 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120172195
No shit, we've seen it work in the Alpha 2.0 demo and the multicrew one.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 10:03:51 No.120173583 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120171802
Because you never know if you're the King at another Purple Wedding.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 11:10:07 No.120178576 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120179260 >>120180216 >>120200371 >>120276027

>>120171669
It doesn't actually make sense though, anon.

While I dig retrofuture so hard, what do you think are cheaper to produce right now? LED/LCD screens with disk drives? or CRTs with tape storage?

The latter is so outdated it would probably be more expensive to build. Unless that was cutting edge for the time, which.. makes even less sense, really.

But I'll accept it so we can have older-style Gladiator cockpit displays, as well as Sabre contemporary ones in the same game. I like both.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 11:18:49 No.120179260 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120178576
I thought it was explained as CRTs being more resilient to space shit, like maybe the artificial gravity thingies? Only heard that on here though, so good chance that that's wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 11:30:47 No.120180216 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120181013

>>120178576
>implying those aren't LED/LCDs behind glass to protect them

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 11:39:24 No.120181013 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120181145

>>120180216
you mean these
>>120167131

Yeah, they're giant-ass CRTs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 11:40:43 No.120181145 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120181013
sealed LED m8 :^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 12:30:18 No.120185774 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120185896

space music time?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcs7bLt9fC8

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 12:31:31 No.120185896 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120186249

>>120185774
The space music to end all space music

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4dNtTPAaFw

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 12:34:35 No.120186249 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120186341

>>120185896

can you post space music that isn't already in my playlist, friend? i need more

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEl2l_5L1cw

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 12:35:24 No.120186341 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120186960

>>120186249
doesnt get much spacier than this
here comes the chinese earthquake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hv6RbEOlqRo

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 12:41:31 No.120186960 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120187885

>>120186341

dammit anon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LDEm8mC-Nw

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO worf.jpg, 47KiB, 500x382

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 12:50:28 No.120187885 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120186960
shit taste

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:02:26 No.120194198 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120196821

corvette when?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:30:12 No.120196821 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120197207

>>120194198
It's not as if your not gonna jew out and fail to purchase it blazer

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unmanned_large_assault_ship__by_ (...).jpg, 692KiB, 1920x826

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:34:30 No.120197207 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120197724 >>120205196

>>120196821
I don't understand your sentence.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO butcher_class_heavy_gunship_by_k (...).png, 2MiB, 2000x1200

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:40:21 No.120197724 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120198543

>>120197207
Heavy weaponry a cute.

A CUTE

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO shizzlemahdizzleyounizzle.png, 67KiB, 510x348

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:49:01 No.120198543 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120198824 >>120198931

>>120197724
>filename

Also, we were promised to find relic ships in the PU. Will this be an option in 2.0 as well? And what about ships we steal?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:52:02 No.120198824 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120198931 >>120199112

>>120198543
When CIG start working on shipwrecks, derelict ships and salvaging and the such I'm sure they will throw them into the baby PU as it is the test bed for everything-PU.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:53:24 No.120198931 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120198543
Of course we will have ship wrecks and stuff.

>>120198824
You beat me to it. I don't expect it day 1 babby PU, but I'd be surprised if they didn't test every game mechanic there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:55:32 No.120199112 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120199634

>>120198824
I bet they'll be derelict ships in the baby PU even from the start, to show off the functionality that was in the multicrew demo. It's not like you'll be able to keep the retaliator or constellation or whatever you find, but it'll be fun to play around with it until you have to log off.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:55:48 No.120199136 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120199402

People are all hyped about finding derelict Bengals, but I'd be more excited for the relatively more frequent finds like Idrii and other ships like whatever corvette they're making now.

Or Xi'an stuff.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 14:59:09 No.120199402 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120199634

>>120199136
>not wanting to shove your Bengal Carrier Dick into random people near a spess station and having all automated turrets on auto defends to rip idiots apart who fire once at you for shits n giggles.

Git gud.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 15:02:06 No.120199634 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120199112
With the damage states and new "ship chunking" they say they have working, this can be really fucking cool. It'd be weird to find a "derelict" ship that isn't fucked up, anyway.

>>120199402
>Bengal
>impyling the instance with that ship won't turn into a persistent battleground of literally everyone fighting over it

Nope.avi. It honestly wouldn't be worth the time trying to get enough people organized to go there, fix it somehow, and then taking the long ass course around the universe since it can only fit some jumpoints. I'll be happy with 4 corvettes and a destroyer find rather than the Bengal.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 15:10:22 No.120200371 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120212664

>>120178576

When I was in the Navy we still used CRTs for more of our displays because they're easy to take apart and repair.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 15:13:51 No.120200684 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120200814

I feel bad for all the people that lost their money to this failed development.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 15:15:13 No.120200814 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120200684
Here's your (You)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 15:27:26 No.120202026 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120202531

R E F U N D
E
F
U
N
D

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 15:32:12 No.120202531 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120202026
Hey smartie how are you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 15:58:20 No.120205196 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120197207
is dat some hiigaaran assault frigate?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1408302618068.jpg, 42KiB, 433x380

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:17:06 No.120207039 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120207219 >>120207457

So how are they going to put out 2.0 if 1.3 is shit?

Have they mentioned if they are going to fix their launcher patch system so we don't have to download 30gb every time they fix/break something?

Janitorial footnote;
This board is /vg/ - Video Games Generals, and this post is about the video game "Star Citizen™" developed by Cloud Imperium Games™ and is therefore not off-topic and does not break any board rules or global rules. Thank you for your understanding in your difficult job.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:18:51 No.120207219 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120208026

>>120207039
1.3 isn't shit, though.

Its a great improvement, though has some stability issues.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:21:11 No.120207457 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120207039
t.autist

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:26:43 No.120208026 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120208679 >>120208680

>>120207219
It has some nice improvements, but I can't stand them massively upping TTK yet again. If I wanted to play Elite: Dangerous with its bullet sponge MMO-esque "dogfighting" I would, but that shit isn't for me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:30:42 No.120208421 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120161863

I wonder if this will ever actually become a videogame general

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:33:10 No.120208679 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120208927

>>120208026
>nigger in a hornet just flying straigh and jousting
>pepper him with sustained fire in my gladius, center mass for 5 seconds
>he receives negligible damage
>chase his tanky ass around the map for like 5 minutes tediously chipping away at him
>he crashes into an asteroid and I don't get shit

So much fun. When's that new physically based damage coming that will apparently fix everything?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:33:10 No.120208680 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120209226

>>120208026
I think it's for the PU. They don't want players to die quickly. I assume it would be better once the physically based damage system is in place. When that happens, components can take damage and ballistics are relative to speed, so it might make things more bearable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:35:34 No.120208927 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120209612 >>120210056

>>120208679
>fly a ship that trades firepower for speed and agility
>complain when you can't insta pop tanky fighters

End yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:38:16 No.120209226 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120208680
I mean, I understand not wanting players to just get instagibbed with no chance to react or defend themselves, but there should be other ways than just giving us obscenely high HP. It also seems like that would be more appropriate on larger multi crew ships instead of the single seater fighters we have now. People started harassing CIG for longer TTK before half of the mechanics for the game are even in, seriously jumping the gun by basing their PU balance on a fucking tiny confined death match arena.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:41:51 No.120209612 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120209815

>>120208927
The Gladius has a tradeoff for firepower, but it isn't that big m8. We're not talking about a Merlin or an M50 here. And 5 seconds of sustained fire center mass isn't "insta popping" a tanky fighter, that's a long ass time for some idiot to not pull any evasive maneuvers, and he did that several times without being punished.

>advocates for scrub tier gameplay where you don't even bother to avoid shots because damage is so negligible

end your self m8

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:43:56 No.120209815 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120210731 >>120211172

>>120209612
Hornets are designed to take fire, and you're complaining why a S2 ballistic isn't demolishing them.

You can easily pop people in a couple of shots with larger ballistic cannons. Kind of what they're designed to do, specifically.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:46:19 No.120210056 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120210256 >>120210349 >>120211783 >>120230136

>>120208927
Maybe you should play Elite if you think that stupidly high TTK and other scrub friendly mechanics are a good thing. You can circle strafe and face tank all day in that crock of shit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-nhC4vf6Ec

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:48:21 No.120210256 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120210417

>>120210056
Maybe you should go play Star Conflict if you want CoD in space.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:49:11 No.120210349 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120210731

>>120210056
If they made it so that a little fire the center of a Hornet popped it with a S2, then Connies would be flying murder machines nobody could touch.

Sorry your highly manouverable fighter with a large missile load doesn't also have a large gun.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:49:55 No.120210417 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120210545

>>120210256
No you should leave with your babby bubble protection mentality.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:51:09 No.120210545 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120210647

>>120210417
Maybe you should learn to fly your ship and what its capable of :^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:52:15 No.120210647 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120212932

>>120210545
Funny how flying has nothing to do with the lack of firepower to blow up $130 "not pay2win" ships.

I'm not even the guy you were shitposting at, I just agree with him. High TTK is shit for scrub noob carebears.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:53:06 No.120210731 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120211257

>>120209815
You're taking the description of the Hornet's durability to an extreme here anon. There's a difference between being able to take its share of hits, and basically being stationary eating 5 seconds of sustained fire with every shot landing while taking no damage.
>>120210349
>5 seconds of continuous fire from 3 S2 guns
>a little fire

That's a significant amount of fire, idiot, and an amount of fire that any pilot not in a coma could easily avoid the majority of. If a pilot is SO shitty that they don't avoid that, do you seriously think they shouldn't receive significant damage? Kill yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:57:08 No.120211172 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120209815
What's funny is that even ships that aren't designed to take fire, like the m50, merlin, and Gladius can still soak up retarded amounts of damage no problem. And it's even worse with them since they have way more maneuverability, and are thus harder to hit, making it even more tedious and scrubby than before.

There's no risk to flying an m50.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 16:57:48 No.120211257 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120212749

>>120210731
Depends where you were hitting them, honestly.

IIRC multiple ships still have invincible parts.

Nose hitpoints on an F7C is 1,200.

3 S2s (lets say all Badgers) is 726dps

So 2 seconds of nose fire from a ship that isn't exactly firepower oriented, to outright kill a ship known to be a tank. I don't think thats high TTK, I think thats you needing to git fukken gud

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:02:33 No.120211783 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120213527

>>120210056
holy fuck that is horrible.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO hmmm.jpg, 330KiB, 2534x1070

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:05:36 No.120212120 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120212526 >>120213362 >>120276218 >>120315804

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:09:19 No.120212526 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120212910

>>120212120
I can't even begin to describe how retarded this chart is. Well memed, my friend.

Horse

Horse Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:10:40 No.120212664 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120200371
they have high resistance to EM interference.making them alot more stable.CRT's don't die. they just fade away.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:11:21 No.120212749 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120212945

>>120211257
I didn't even say outright kill, I just said significant damage. As in not one piece of the shitters hull was red or anything. He shrugged it off, several times, until eventually crashing into an asteroid right in front of him. Come to think of it, he might have been AFK during a lot of that dogfight. Not like it mattered since TTK and damage is fucked beyond all reason.

>So 2 seconds of nose fire from a ship that isn't exactly firepower oriented, to outright kill a ship known to be a tank. I don't think thats high TTK, I think thats you needing to git fukken gud

It was 5 seconds, not 2. Maybe the Hornet pilot should get good and learn to not AFK fly in a straight line.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:12:51 No.120212910 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120213362 >>120213397

>>120212526
Perhaps try a a creative writing class, to work on your English language and descriptive skills.

Aurora:
2 guns
$40

Javelin:
25? crew (25? turrets with 2 guns each)
$2500

Facts, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:13:04 No.120212932 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120210647
It should be about a balance.

Nobody likes the idea of just flying along and then getting instantly slagged, yet at the same time we like the idea of ambushing people. We don't like the idea of our fancy ships being torn apart in seconds, but we like the visceral feel of a well executed attack run popping someone's ship.

If you die too quickly in combat, it becomes a loop from the hospital to the battlefield. If you don't, then fucking nothing ever happens and its boring.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:13:12 No.120212945 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120213225

>>120212749
>It was 5 seconds, not 2. Maybe the Hornet pilot should get good and learn to not AFK fly in a straight line.

Even the body hit points on a hornet is 1.4k.

5 seconds of sustained fire to any part of the hull would have killed him twice over.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:15:39 No.120213225 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120214706

>>120212945
You are taking into account the shield values, correct? Effective HP =/= HP for specific parts. And since we're using the Badger as the baseline, shields eat those up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:16:48 No.120213362 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120213605 >>120214029

>>120212120
>>120212910

Stay mad that people who contribute a lot to the game start out with a warship and you don't. Forget the fact that "winning" is an entirely arbitrary concept in a sandbox game. Forget the fact that no matter how big their guns are the Navy has bigger guns. Forget the fact that Arena Commander is not the final game. Just keep pushing the same stale rhetoric and shitposting material we've all seen for years.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:17:09 No.120213397 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120213605

>>120212910
Because a destroyer class vessel needs to be on par with a starter ship, and that "winning" can only be interpreted as through 1v1 battles in AC and not the larger PU economy . Here's your reply.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:18:17 No.120213527 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120213842

>>120211783
What do you mean? Elite's high TTK gameplay is obviously skill based and exciting. Shield potions are the best...

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:18:57 No.120213605 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120213842 >>120214143

>>120213397
>Because a destroyer class vessel needs to be on par with a starter ship
What.

Selling power = pay2win.

>>120213362
>"winning" is an entirely arbitrary concept in a sandbox game
Sounds like something someone with powerful pay2win ships in their hangar would say.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:20:50 No.120213842 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120214465

>>120213527
I think certain ships would be designed to be spoungy with very powerful shields to boot, and I also don't think ships in SC should just die very quickly when fighting ships on their level or from weaker weapons. I see SHs kill eachother rather quickly since they have fuckloads of weapons. I guess we'll just have to wait and see if they can reach a middle ground since it clearly isn't final.

>>120213605
k

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:22:22 No.120214029 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120214143

>>120213362
lol, I think even the warships are just hulls with no weapons or military-spec hardware too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:23:18 No.120214143 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120214465 >>120214635

>>120213605

I'm going to buy the Corvette when it comes out just to piss off faggots like you.

>>120214029

The Frigate comes with guns, but the Destroyer doesn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:26:06 No.120214465 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120214635

>>120214143
>i'm going to spend thousands of dollars for jpgs just to annoy you

>>120213842
>k
That feel when you know you made someone angry and you can't contain your smile.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:27:03 No.120214564 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120214714 >>120215165

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCkxYFRI7RU

Something like this will never happen in SC.

What's even the point? 20 vs 20 is not an MMO.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:27:36 No.120214635 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120214143
Oh yeah. I'm also looking forward to the Corvette. I hope it's carrack sized and can have 2 snub fighters. Not a full hangar for hornets like the bloated Idris, but at least something to buzz around.

>>120214465
k

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:28:14 No.120214706 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120215534 >>120216446 >>120219529 >>120222495

>>120213225
No, I'm not.

Lets do that too, just so we have a true indication from a clean, freshly painted Hornetnig

1,400HP for body section

1,200HP for nose section

7,375HP for entire ship (i.e total damage that can be sustained from shooting off stupid, irrelevant parts but still eventually kill the ship)

5,400HP for the F7C-M's quad shield, 1350/per segment

>With Badgers (726dps, 100% damage to shield and hull)

Worst time (All shields + All hull): 17.6s
Good time (All shields + Body): 9.3s
Best time (All shields + Nose):9.0s

>With Scorpion GT-215, and 2 x Sawbucks (635dps, 60% damage to hull even through shielding)

Worst time (All hull): 19.4s
Good time (All body): 3.7s
Best time (All nose):1.9s

So, basically, with the right loadout you can kill a fully shielded Hornet in less than 2 seconds even with a Gladius, should you be lucky.

I wouldn't call that high TTK.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:28:19 No.120214714 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120214564
Good, Null sec blobs of 200v200 were boring AS FUCK.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:32:06 No.120215165 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120214564
Honestly, I'd prefer SC battles of relatively smaller scale warfare. Of course with interior zoning it would be more than 20 v 20, but massive amounts of players gets too chaotic. And the time dilation was horrible when things got too big.

Eve overall was too grindy with little fun, and mainly commanders had fun while smaller people got rekt almost immediately in the droves. If there's one thing Eve had that I want SC to have is the orgs fucking eachother over. Drama is always nice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:32:37 No.120215234 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120232096

I wonder how many anti-pay2win shitposters caved in and spent their autismbucks on Star Citizen. They probably spend their time attacking anyone who criticizes pay2win now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:34:59 No.120215534 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120215926

>>120214706
We need more stuff like this. Do you perhaps know how they're going to use the HP system with physically based damage + procedural damage marking?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:38:33 No.120215926 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120216446

>>120215534
I have no godamn clue anon.

I wouldn't be surprised if HP matters less and less once we get component damage in.

Having your powerplant have holes in it seems an order of magnitude more deadly than peppering your ship's frame, which is currently how we die in the game, other than having your pilot turned to pink mist.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:43:17 No.120216446 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120217368

>>120214706
I want something that can calculate this with weapon inputs and all ships. Would be very useful.

>>120215926
All I know is this:
- Components can take damage individually and be exposed with enough damage
- The ship hull also takes damage and is seen procedurally
- Ship chunks can be broken off as per a recent description

this makes me question what level of weaponry is required to break entire chunks off of ships, and how this can effect maneuvering. Like, at what point would a constellation simply fall apart in flames instead of that longass death animation, not allowing the crew to escape. I'd assume retaliators can break in half but I want to know what power is required. I want to know a lot of things.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:44:14 No.120216556 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120216964 >>120217202 >>120217368 >>120222173

Thoughts on Infinity battlescape in the mean time?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:47:36 No.120216964 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120217374

>>120216556
Looks better than Scam Citizen and is only just in kickstarter. The future of space sims looks promising. Thanks to CIG showing how willing people are to crowd fund if they think the devs aren't lying.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:49:44 No.120217202 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120216556
I think it looks great so far. They have a trailer now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJqkiNAuBrw

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:51:17 No.120217368 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120217776 >>120217979 >>120218914 >>120220617

>>120216556
Another game that thinks excessive scale and procedurally generated 'content' is a great idea. I haven't seen anything about it that hooks me in any way yet.

The fact that one of the videos say it has been in development for "many, many years" also worries me.

Not something I will pick up until its out.

>>120216446
I can probably whip something up real quick, but it would have to be upated for every patch.

Its also pretty rough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:51:24 No.120217374 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120217776

>>120216964
smartie, how is your internet warlord today? has he threatened to sue someone yet?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:55:16 No.120217776 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120218087 >>120218118

>>120217374
>responding to bait

>>120217368
If you can create the tools to allow such numeric understanding of all parts with interactive inputs of weapons, it would be a godsend to SC. I know a guy who apparently goes through all patch notes and documents changes not talked about, so if you can create a tool making this information available to tards like myself, it would make understanding TTK and balance a lot easier, and can also allow strategy to be developed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:57:01 No.120217979 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120218118

>>120217368
>thinks lots of content, big environments and procedural generation is bad
>proceeds to gobble up scam citizen
See that star? You can climb it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:57:53 No.120218087 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120218368 >>120218914

>>120217776
bait? i was just inquiring as to his lord and master? I was genuinely curious

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 17:58:08 No.120218118 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120218368 >>120218914

>>120217979
Not what I said, Todd.

>>120217776
I'll make it, might as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:00:29 No.120218368 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120218545

>>120218087
>if you aren't a shit-sucking consumer of Scam Citizen
>you must be flavour of the month goon meme and do what Derek Smart says

>>120218118
Then elaborate? You know Scam Citizen has procedural generation in it right? So how is that different to other games giving massive scale using the same thing?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:01:59 No.120218545 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120219137

>>120218368
>Then elaborate? You know Scam Citizen has procedural generation in it right? So how is that different to other games giving massive scale using the same thing?

Star Citizen is using a large amount of handcrafted content, especially landing zones. Its topped up with procedural shit. E:D and games like it run purely on procedural shit.

There is a large, LARGE difference in that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:02:18 No.120218591 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120218675

I've been trying immensely hard not to get excited about this game, but I finally caved and got the 45 dollar 'Aurora LN' package, so I could try it. Holy shit, guys-- Even without all the stuff to come, the arena commander flight is so fucking smooth it makes me weep. So, I saved up, and upgraded to a Freelancer, and while I can't fly it yet, I'm still immensely stoked for it. I'm debating whether or not to upgrade to the MAX, but for now, I'm pleased by just flying around in the available ships, then coming home to stare at the inside of my Lancer and mumble 'Yep, that's mine.'

I really hope this game turns out to be as amazing as it looks like it will be.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO d3a.png, 263KiB, 520x377

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:03:07 No.120218675 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120218914

>>120218591

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:05:26 No.120218914 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120219137 >>120219182 >>120219419 >>120219536

>>120218087
>caring about DS's whereabouts
I can't shake my head fast enough.

>>120217368
You think of procedural generation wrong. SC plans to use it for planetary surfaces and asteriod fields so that devs don't have to create every single one by hand, thus saving time. So it needs a middle ground to succeed - procedural on things that don't require the time, like landscapes and rocks, and handcrafting on other things, like cities. Procedural isn't always a bad thing, just when you don't use it at all things can take too long, and when you use it too much it get repetitive. I think I:BS might be using it too much, sadly, but I'd need more video to be conclusive.

>>120218675
How is that bait? He looks happy. Is reverse baiting a thing now?

>>120218118
http://symthic.com/bf4-stats
Something like this would be fantastic. Probably a bit much for one person, but it looks like a great direction for stats. Godspeed

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:07:31 No.120219137 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120219363

>>120218914
I elaborated here
>>120218545

I agree that PG has its place. Its just awful when you rely on it too heavily or in some cases entirely.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:07:51 No.120219182 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120219363

>>120218914
>How is that bait?
Got excited for nothing, called AC so smooth it made him cry, and is excited about mumbling to himself inside the Freelancer, etc.
>looks amazing

Obvious bait.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:09:22 No.120219363 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120219182
Fair enough

>>120219137
My mistake.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:09:45 No.120219419 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120220020

>>120218914
That shit is pretty slick.

I might make that eventually, but while everything is pretty simple (i.e no modifiers like tuning/supercharging) it'll probably just be an interactive google doc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:10:47 No.120219529 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120220257

>>120214706
I don't know anon, less than 2 seconds, but that's with some very specific circumstances such as using high DPS ballistics that deliver 60% of their damage directly through shields, to the most fragile part of the ship which is also the smallest target.

Even then, that's 1.9 seconds under ludicrously ideal conditions. And ballistics are much slower than energy weapons like the badger. At that point we may as well factor missiles in as well by saying that we can lob 8 missiles at some fool who makes no effort to avoid them, and they will die in under a second.

For practical purposes with a general purpose loadout, I still find the TTK to be ridiculously high to the point where it lessens the need for pilot skill in general, as well as the need to avoid shots or maneuver smartly, but instead emphasizes ED style facetanking and min/maxed loadouts being the flavor of dogfights. It simply doesn't feel satisfying or fun anymore, weapons are anemic and the dogfights are sleepy battles of attrition.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:10:51 No.120219536 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120218914
but anon-kun they have nothing else to live for, they live and breath news about SC all day, they are just as autistic as this channel but worse

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:15:01 No.120220020 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120219419
>tuning and charging

Jesus christ I forgot about that. Maybe I should contact symthic and see if they're willing to set this up professionally instead of killing some anon to make a spreadhseet. That sounds like the most logical thing since there will be so much information to be considered for the many weapons and components of SC to come.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:16:53 No.120220257 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120220983

>>120219529
Its 1.9 seconds for a smaller target, but its still under 4 for the entire body / center of mass for the Hornet. Through shields. I wouldn't call that 'ludicrously ideal', I'd call that simply hitting the thing.

Sawbucks also aren't high DPS. They're 180dps.
In the same size category we have GT-870s at 267dps, and Sledge IIs at 219dps if we're talking pure ballistics. There are higher DPS size 1 guns.

However; I do know there are bugs with ships not actually recieving this damage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:19:37 No.120220617 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120217368
I:B is way smaller scale than Star Citizen, dude. It's a single solar system, which they're deliberately confining themselves to because they know that ED style "400 gorillion stars" is boring impractical garbage. They're actually using procedural generation correctly unlike those idiots at Frontier, who just had it do everything. It's a foundation that they will then go in and hand build everything on top of.

>The fact that one of the videos say it has been in development for "many, many years" also worries me.

It was the pet project of 1 dude working on it part time with infrequent help from unpaid volunteers. It was "in development" in the way that many mods are "in development."

I dunno, I think as far as kickstarters go, they're keeping their goals reasonable and have presented a pretty impressive prototype.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:22:59 No.120220983 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120230345

>>120220257
I suppose. Though I suppose talk of this is pretty much pointless since the entire damage system is getting scrapped with physically based damage. Which sounds like it would make weapons damage ships in a realistic way according to their mass/energy.

I won't be sad to see the crappy HP values go.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:23:35 No.120221059 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120221175 >>120221224 >>120221467

High TTK is important for getting scifi movie scenes of clutch mid-chase repairs. Arrtoo can't bring the shield generator back online if you blow up as soon as your shields go down.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:24:43 No.120221175 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120221059
>mid-chase repairs
Autist detected.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:25:14 No.120221224 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120221864 >>120222762

>>120221059
Its important for battles not to be shit.

It can't be too high but it can't be too low, either. The former just feels like you're fighting a sponge and the latter introduces a lot of RNG, irritating deaths you didn't deserve, and removes a lot of ship roles / potential gameplay.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:27:13 No.120221467 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120221648

>>120221059
Quite the opposite really, it's more important to put an emphasis on maneuvering or increasing the difficulty of achieving a good firing solution for that. In movies, you'll notice that they generally take one shot, pull evasive maneuvers while Darth Badguy and his cronies frantically try to hit him again. It's not just Darth Badguy parking on top of him piling lasers into his arsehole while laughing "HAHAHA NOW YOUR HULL IS DOWN TO 75% IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:28:48 No.120221648 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120221864 >>120222559

>>120221467
>"HAHAHA NOW YOUR HULL IS DOWN TO 75% IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME"

See: every Star Trek episode, ever regarding shield integrity

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:30:50 No.120221864 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120221224
It shouldn't be one shot one kill, but lowish TTK doesn't have to be RNG or irritating if the game presents you with information or opportunities to avoid it. Like how tactical shooters such as old school Rainbow Six had low TTK, you had to use your tools to survive and beat your opponent instead of running in like it's Call of Duty, because you would get your ass whooped.
>>120221648
Star Trek isn't exactly famous for exciting battle scenes.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 56rtfgvb.jpg, 259KiB, 640x480

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:32:57 No.120222075 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120222495

We just need more ballistic ammo, fams. I see literally no use to a ballistic weapon in the PU atm. They simply aren't viable for long distance runs and will be inferior to energy weapons when you notice they will never run out of ammo, even if they're weaker.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Starfold_Cruiser.png, 1MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:33:42 No.120222173 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120216556
I think Infinity looks cool. They have surprisingly good art direction that reminds me of Homeworld. I like the seamless solar system/planets, it makes ED look like shit. I like that they have a focused goal that isn't trying to compete with ED or SC, it honestly sounds like it could be a cool space Planetside 2 thingy. Might be cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:36:57 No.120222495 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120222921

>>120222075
See
>>120214706

Ballistics reward precision, and allow you to chew fuckers up. Ammo should be a limitation, forcing you to choose to either soften people up with lasers before destroying their hull with ballistics extremely quickly, or learning to shoot you massive scrublord

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:37:29 No.120222559 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120221648
Well, I guess when people were saying that SC = Star Wars and Elite = Star Trek... they weren't wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:39:27 No.120222762 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120231072

>>120221224
I wonder if stuff like parts of the ship going offline will actually be relevant in an interesting way in real play with a long TTK. If taking out their thrusters makes it a certain kill and you can't conceivably want to do anything other than kill them when that happens, they might as well just blow up instead. But if taking out thrusters is far enough away from blowing up the ship, you can get situations where in larger battles it's better to disable your target to gang up on others, gambling on them being unable to repair in time before you come back to finish them.

I could definitely see a stealth attack aimed at disabling comms happening commonly when bursting down the entire ship immediately is out of the picture.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:41:10 No.120222921 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120223276

>>120222495
The problem with that reasoning is that ballistics are slow as death and can't fucking hit anything unless it's stationary or flying super predictably, so it already has a significant trade off as opposed to the super high velocity energy weapons. Making it so that they have no ammo in addition to being piss easy to avoid would make ballistics practically useless since the cons would outweigh the pros.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:44:38 No.120223276 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120226619

>>120222921
Ballistics are shorter ranged, but nobody is dodging bullets unless you're spraying from a kilometer away like a retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:17:16 No.120226619 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120227769 >>120228256

>>120223276
>Space
>A kilometer is long range.

I'm kinda ass mad about the engagement/effective ranges, tbh. The idea that the game/targeting computer just stops giving you an firing solution at an arbitrary range annoys me. If I have the target acquired and selected my computer should be able to plot a simple intercept vector for any of my weapons. particularly kinetics, which won't even be losing focus/intensity the way energy weapons might.

Lazers should be high velocity, limited damage and losing effectiveness with range as the particle-beam-bolt spreads out. Kinetics should maintain course, speed and energy until they leave the instance and despawn and I should be able to plot at least a theoretical intercept for anything my radar can acquire, even if that thing is 15km away and will surely have changed course by the time my shell gets there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:29:40 No.120227769 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120238483

>>120226619
If you start getting realistic about distances you don't see your target in a space battle. Like you literally are too far for light reflecting off them to have much chance of hitting your own vessel's viewport.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:35:23 No.120228256 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120228642 >>120263478

>>120226619
Everything is shortened because muh ww2 dogfights

But we'll see longer ranged shit once we step out of AC's teeny tiny combat arena

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:40:02 No.120228642 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120229132

>>120228256
Are we actually escaping arena hell? I'm worried that each area will just have these arena-like boundaries and only let you travel to other areas through gates or a menu.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:45:51 No.120229132 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120229858

>>120228642
Yeah, we are.

Thats been talked about a lot of times, the idea that you could fly in 200m/s manouvering speed from a location to another in the same system, if you had unlimited fuel.

a big part of double bit precision and why they needed it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:53:52 No.120229858 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120229132
Thank god

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:56:25 No.120230136 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120230368 >>120230808

>>120210056
Nice 2014 video.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:58:30 No.120230345 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120220983
It will just be that damage ~= mass * velocity ^2

Won't be a revolutionary change in how ships break apart, just how much damage weapons do, with some also having a tiny stunning force (in practice super thrusters will cancel this out easily unless they add a silly stun effect )

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 19:58:44 No.120230368 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120230136
I loaded up E:D about a week ago to see how shit it still was, and I can still abuse the fuck out of them.

Not that I tried for very long, mind you. Combat in that game bores me to fucking tears

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:02:40 No.120230808 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120230136
If you think that's changed since release, you would have to be a delusional ED fanboy. That's still the state of the game, Sandro Sammarco says that he specifically saw nothing wrong with that video.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:05:05 No.120231072 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120231520

>>120222762
I think that's more of a larger ship thing. As it is, I dont think it will be relevant for anything smaller than a connie.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:09:09 No.120231520 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120231072
Yup. Your cooling system in a fighter won't be relevent when your guns take 3x a long to cool down or overcharge frequently in a battle, or that your powerplants won't really be needed if they are damaged/destroyed...

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:14:31 No.120232096 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120232231 >>120233335

>>120215234
I bought a reclaimer when it came out so I can comfy in space without needing to worry about losing all my money because I fell asleep at the keyboard, but there's no way I'm dropping money on a combat ship. Feels wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:15:51 No.120232231 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120262207 >>120268590

>>120232096
Not sure I follow your logic, anon.

Is your reasoning that you feel LTI fighters are overpowered/cheesy?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:26:33 No.120233335 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120262448 >>120268590

>>120232096
>implying a reclaimer will somehow keep you safe from pirates, vanduul, and people who just want kill
kek, you're in for a surprise when you find out that your ship is fair game to anyone who is dedicated enough to steal it.

> but there's no way I'm dropping money on a combat ship. Feels wrong.
>feels wrong
.....what? Are you some space-bound treehugger?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:29:50 No.120233649 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120233851 >>120233996 >>120234132

Any legal eagles in the house. Can a document stored on the internet be considered private after the invites people to read it and links it in a public forum?

http://forums.SocialjusticeAutistism.com/showthread.php?threadid=3744337&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=731#post451890124

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:31:53 No.120233851 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120234708

>>120233649
No

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:33:21 No.120233996 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120234708

>>120233649
yes

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:34:52 No.120234132 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120234267 >>120234708

>>120233649
maybe

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:36:06 No.120234267 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120234132
I DON'T KNNOOOW

CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:41:00 No.120234708 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120233851
>>120233996
>>120234132
Here's some (You)'s for you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:41:21 No.120234742 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120234906 >>120234975 >>120237014

been wanting to buy this fucking game for ever

should i take the aurora LN package or wait for the anniversary sales ?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Stinger - Vanduul Heavy Fighter (...).png, 3MiB, 1661x922

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:42:14 No.120234827 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120234923 >>120332072 >>120332525 >>120332706 >>120332941

post picture of shipfu, faggots.

Claiming alium heavy-fighter goodness

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:43:17 No.120234906 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120235194

>>120234742
SC 'sales' only make limited ships availible again, so no reason to wait if you just want a basic package.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:43:25 No.120234923 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120235267

>>120234827
>Having a cuck heavy fighter that has a ship specifically designed to do its job better

kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:44:03 No.120234975 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120235194

>>120234742
No point waiting, anniversary is just selling the limited ships that cost dramatically more than what any of us should have pledged.

Yes, CIG got way too much, I wanted the original shit more than what I see

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:46:18 No.120235194 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120235620 >>120236419

>>120234906
>>120234975
ok, thanks

so aurora ln is the best starter package right ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:47:09 No.120235267 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120235483 >>120235683

>>120234923
>cuck misusage
>>>/v/
>a ship specifically designed to do it's job better
You mean the Vanguard that sacrifices maneuverability for range, or the inaccessible F8?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:49:26 No.120235483 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120235902

>>120235267
>You mean the Vanguard that sacrifices maneuverability for range, or the inaccessible F8?

>Aegis Dynamics has designed the Sabre in response to a United Empire of Earth Navy’s request for proposal for a next-generation fighter capable of outmatching the Vanduul STINGER-class heavy fighter in speed and turning

:^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:50:49 No.120235620 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120236616 >>120236829

>>120235194
just saw that if i put a slav country for the billing i dont pay vat (7€), do i risk something ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:51:29 No.120235683 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120235267
C U C K E D
U
C
K
E
D

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:53:46 No.120235902 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120236032

>>120235483
And that is supposed to dissuade me... how? I still love the stinger
>do it's job better
>speed and turning are now the sole job of heavy fighters, not tanking hits or dealing heavier damage to slower vehicles or other heavy fighters
k

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:54:57 No.120236032 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120235902
Anon you really should be getting along, you have to prep the bull

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 20:58:43 No.120236419 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120239050

>>120235194
For what gameplay is currently available and will be in the near future, Aurora is basically the worst ship. Mustangs have the same pricetag (so you can trade them freely back and forth) and are fast light fighters, making them a better starter ship for the time being. In the full planned game with a persistent universe, Aurorae have a wider range of jobs they can be used for.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:00:51 No.120236616 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120235620
Only your eternal dignity for identifying yourself as a slav.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:02:58 No.120236829 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120235620
unless you can squat, you risk the gulag

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:04:48 No.120237014 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120237236 >>120237506

>>120234742
get out while u can

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1snmrfj

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:06:46 No.120237236 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120237307 >>120237506

>>120237014
>Now we're at war.

HE BETTER NOT RUIN MY SPACE SIM

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:07:31 No.120237307 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120237506 >>120237581

>>120237236
Derek couldn't ruin anything but his own game

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:09:38 No.120237506 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120237014
I'm still surprised he has the will to type this much.

>>120237307
kek, but true.

>>120237236
Assuming you're a newfag, he's been trying for many months now. The first few times he scared people, but now he's just a meme name to throw around and his word has no credibility.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:10:19 No.120237581 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120237952

>>120237307
but he's semi retired, he doesn't even work on his own game anymore anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:14:17 No.120237952 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120238087 >>120238524 >>120239516

>>120237581
Maybe he should be employing all the people CIG has fired. They are BOUND to make the BDSSE right?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO buttplugs.jpg, 44KiB, 587x428

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:15:03 No.120238032 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120238448 >>120306868

what an asshole

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:15:39 No.120238087 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120238610

>>120237952
dude, fucking brilliant!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:19:36 No.120238448 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120238032
>ds_goes_to_a_tesla_showroom.jpg

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:19:59 No.120238483 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120238805

>>120227769
I don't want "realistic" distances since that would be firstly, no fun at all and secondly impossibly hard on computers.

I just want the option of shooting at something the my sensors can pick up. IE If I've detected a Hull E with a massive Sig at 21.8km, I want a lead pip for its current course and I want want my kinetics to actually go that far, even if they may not be accurate enough for a hit or fast enough to intercept before it changes course.
an intercept vector is a simple math problem I could do on pencil and paper if I had the relevant trajectories and velocities, there is no good reason a targeting computer cant give you that for any ship you have targeted.

TL:DR this is space, If I can see it, it should be within gun range.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:20:39 No.120238524 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120238842

>>120237952
It's hard to believe anyone would willingly work with him.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:21:31 No.120238610 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120238816

>>120238087
https://youtu.be/vfol_TLLnIw

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:23:41 No.120238805 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120238483
Yeah, that isn't happening and you shouldn't expect it to, either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:23:46 No.120238816 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120238610
alestorm is fucking awesome, thanks for the headbanging link anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:24:04 No.120238842 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120240798

>>120238524
people suck dick for money, anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:26:17 No.120239050 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120269207

>>120236419
>making them a better starter ship for the time being
The Mustang Alpha really isn't that good anymore. The most fragile ship in the game, has the smallest gun mounts, no missiles, mediocre speed, and can barely land without snapping it's own landing gear off. And it only has 25m/s on the Aurora now.

The Aurora LN is slow as fuck, but can at least spam missiles and maybe kill something before it's shot down.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:31:20 No.120239516 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120242613 >>120246895

>>120237952
>fired
I'm pretty sure the people who left did so for different jobs, or because their contract ended, ie Illfonic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:39:31 No.120240323 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120240745 >>120240798 >>120245758

what hangar do you have ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:43:49 No.120240745 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120240323
Self land :3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:44:23 No.120240798 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120238842
>sucking dick is worse than working for derek

>>120240323
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tzWc3Xl4B0

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:48:45 No.120241214 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120247365

What are the best weapons per size?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 22:03:50 No.120242613 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120239516
muh dick

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 22:27:58 No.120245106 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120245941

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/electronic-access/Weapon-Roms/Strife-Mass-Driver
>any good?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 22:34:34 No.120245758 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120240323
Industrial hangar is best hangar.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 22:36:38 No.120245941 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120245106
It's OK. It's eats your energy though

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 22:46:37 No.120246895 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120249872 >>120251671

>>120239516
Only fired one was pugh.

He probably fucked up something bad, because he's the one CIG won't talk about. The rest were 'sad to see go to better offers '

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 22:51:30 No.120247365 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120241214
well since damn near everything overheats too fast now, the weapon velocities are way off between ballistics and energy, and they buffed shields again, current meta seems to be S1 Longsword, S2 Tarantula, S3 Tarantula Mk3, and Tempest for missiles still.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 23:16:44 No.120249872 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120250732 >>120251671

>>120246895
I'm gunna say it was drugs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 23:26:14 No.120250732 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120251671

>>120249872
He probably tested positive for weed, you watch. I'm calling it now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 23:35:00 No.120251671 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120246895
>>120249872
>>120250732
Wasn't Will the one who got fired for weed?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1444855471716-1.gif, 259KiB, 500x354

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 23:37:13 No.120251928 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120252073 >>120252621 >>120252953 >>120254269 >>120260250

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlMf9B1ZD0I

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 23:38:26 No.120252073 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120251928
>Published on Oct 13, 2013

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 23:43:58 No.120252621 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120251928
These girls are awfully chubby for this portrayal of bulimia. Hard to buy it tbh.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 23:47:23 No.120252953 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120254318

>>120251928
that would be fun though

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:01:34 No.120254269 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120251928
https://youtu.be/rVFvzhxr9Jw

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:02:15 No.120254318 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120252953
It's probably what they put their little astronaut kids in, their equivalent of the bouncy castle.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:08:38 No.120254874 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120255168 >>120255305

what is the buggy actually for?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:11:50 No.120255168 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120256010

>>120254874
Getting around areas quickly. I imagine that if you landed on some planet you wouldn't want to run everywhere. Although, it's mainly for massive hangars.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:13:23 No.120255305 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120254874
Testing, basically.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:21:26 No.120256010 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120255168
yeah I tried the asteroid hangar and it took forever to run through

arccorp is pretty big too tbh

the buggy reminds me of austin powers

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:35:25 No.120257129 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120257321

How do I switch between the mouse modes in 1.3? Virtual joystick mode is shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:37:53 No.120257321 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120257129
right alt + m

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 00:52:19 No.120258376 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120260035

>>120171802
because he's a bad with knives as he is with game development

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:18:48 No.120260035 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120258376
Bazinga!

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:21:26 No.120260250 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120260430 >>120261958

>>120251928
>KWA attempts to shitpost

isn't most of your org full of literally every other org?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:23:46 No.120260430 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120260250
Aren't all the orgs just furry meetups anyway?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1415353822197.jpg, 58KiB, 644x767

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:30:21 No.120260932 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120261097 >>120261968

>finish downloading 1.3
>trying to get into arc corp for 30 minutes and only errors
>arena commander now runs like shit
>my aurora is sliding more than a boat

thanks roberts, this is the game of my dreams

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:32:42 No.120261097 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120260932
>you're telling a truthful greentext story
should have gotten a refund like your autistic brethren, smartie.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:45:35 No.120261958 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120260250
What's KWA?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1433543745654.jpg, 192KiB, 1001x602

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:45:41 No.120261968 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120262064

>>120260932
>tfw having no problems on my end and my Gladiator flies like a dream with HOTAS now

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:47:17 No.120262064 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120262154

>>120261968
What's that thing your frog is holding?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:48:38 No.120262154 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120262064
Triggering device.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:49:27 No.120262207 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120232231
not at all. I just want to earn mine in-game, it's a personal preference.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 01:53:02 No.120262448 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120233335
>kek, you're in for a surprise when you find out that your ship is fair game to anyone who is dedicated enough to steal it.

duh, did you read my post? I don't want to get all buttmad if that happens, which I would think it inevitably will. At least I get the hull back, for free.

>.....what? Are you some space-bound treehugger?

n-no... I just want to earn my combat ships, and also it SHOULD hurt if you lose one.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 02:07:50 No.120263478 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120268264

>>120228256
> Muh ww2 dogfights

Like you have a better idea for how to make a fun space game? Douche.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 02:14:28 No.120263873 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120265080

I think space combat in this game would be more realistic if we just shot AI piloted smart munitions at each other from about 1AU out.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 02:33:09 No.120265080 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120263873
Drone pilot too with no speedcap.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 05:42:23 No.120265947 Report Delete

Quoted By:

godspeed shitty thread o7

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:35:29 No.120268264 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120268596

>>120263478
>WW2 dogfight
>Based on energy retention, turn rate, or boom n' zoom using superior altitude / climb rate
>Any of this mattering in fucking space

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:42:20 No.120268590 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120232231
>>120233335

The reason I won't buy a combat ship with LTI is because Derek Smart has a large shaft in my mouth, and I couldn't scroll far enough down the pledge page to get to real combat ships before he blew a load with his huge 7 cm cock in my mouth.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:42:38 No.120268596 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120268669

>>120268264
and yet some still want turn battles determined by xml values

aurora turns so slow now

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:44:06 No.120268669 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120268851

>>120268596
You could turn like a pregnant whale and it wouldn't induce turn fighting when we have decoupled mode.

Aurora is a light merchantile ship, don't expect it to go toe to toe with fighters and do all that well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:48:00 No.120268851 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120268960

>>120268669
it would when another ship decides it will strafe behind you so you can't even shoot at it

I'm not saying go toe-to-toe but limiting rotation is dumb. It is already much more sluggish with worse armor and weapons than the real fighters

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:50:03 No.120268960 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120268851
>It is already much more sluggish with worse armor and weapons than the real fighters

Eh. I haven't flown it lately but it having a turn rate isn't the end of the world. I used to be able to spin around and catch people all the time unless they're in M50s/350Rs, but thats kind of a whole other board game.

Its not designed for AC, is my point.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:55:19 No.120269207 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120269323

>>120239050

>missiles
I know I'm autistic, but you mean't "rockets" on the Aurora LN.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 06:58:00 No.120269323 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120274220

>>120269207
Doesn't it come equipped with Marksmen IIs? They're missiles.

Only rockets in the game are the Delta's pods.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO dsbs.png, 55KiB, 639x546

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 07:50:46 No.120271473 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120271772 >>120272023 >>120272083 >>120272185 >>120272235

:^)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Concept_citcon2015_2.jpg, 1MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 07:57:58 No.120271751 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 07:58:25 No.120271772 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120271941

>>120271473
>We want to be above reproach when it comes to our writing, and we want you to enjoy the perspectives of our writers without questioning the motives behind the conversations we’re starting.

welp, already failed

i see he's attempting to use a journalism shield to protect himself

bit late for that

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:02:31 No.120271941 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120272023 >>120272125

>>120271772
it's fake tho

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:04:20 No.120272023 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120271473
What >>120271941 said.

http://ugdb.com/Team

All this goon drama generation is getting old.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:05:32 No.120272083 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120271473
>http://ugdb.com/Team
6/10 well baited my friend

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:06:24 No.120272125 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120271941
too meta memed for me

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:08:02 No.120272185 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120274138

>>120271473
I get why you inserted Derek in there but why did you move everyone's designation around?

That would give it away even faster you doofus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:09:11 No.120272235 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120271473
>social advocate
>social advocate
>social advocate
>social advocate

Does that mean what I think it means?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:50:45 No.120274138 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120272185
I don't know what you mean. only changed that one surename on their failing kickstarter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:52:28 No.120274220 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120274405

>>120269323

You're right, they are missiles. REALLY short ranged missiles too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:54:38 No.120274316 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120274345 >>120274627 >>120274660

How can you, as indie developer, have such an incredibly massive amount of money and still be unable to produce a working product that doesnt even hold up in presentations?

Are there literally just 5 guys working on Star Citizen? At the current rate, we are not going to see the game finish before 2020, memes aside.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:55:13 No.120274345 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120274316
>>>/out/

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 08:56:31 No.120274405 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120274782

>>120274220
All the missiles have a range like they were thrown from the cockpit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:01:22 No.120274627 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120280442 >>120281835

>>120274316

The release of the mini-PU and Star Marine will let us get a good feeling of how far they are. They held up Star Marine since March (if I recall correctly), and the mini-PU was scheduled for Summer 2015 over a year ago. If they aren't really polished, or full of glitches, then we will have a great idea of how this game is going to turn out.

This is why Chris wants to make sure the game is as beautiful as it can be. But if it doesn't perform well, then I'd like to know what the fuck all these gameplay developers are doing.

I can see the art direction moving smoothly, but its the gameplay and networking that I am supremely skeptical of. If this game is shit, I'll just try to sell my collectors edition for as much money as I can to retards who would buy it, all in order to redeem as much money as I can.

Right now, if they don't have a (mostly) fleshed and refined Star Marine or mini-PU by mid-December, then it is time to abandon this fucking ship.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:01:59 No.120274660 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120274316
The presentations are done live with first iterations of new tech. Considering how many things could go wrong their presentations have been very impressive

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:04:31 No.120274782 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120274405

Jesus Christ. So do the majority of the missiles act a lot like the ones on the Aurora LN? If so, that would explain why I can evade any missile in a Merlin by just flying at max speed.

(One time, I dismantled the armaments on the Merlin, and forgot to put my countermeasures back while playing around with equipment. I thought I was in deep shit, but I didn't feel like loading the match again, so I kept in the dogfight. Needless to say, I didn't need the missiles, cause just normal flying in a Merlin outruns any of them.)

I still have never been hit by a missile in a Merlin, and that's even when I'm too pre-occupied to launch countermeasures.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:20:14 No.120275570 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120275663 >>120275798 >>120282231

I swear I'm playing a different game to half of these people.

>doesnt even hold up in presentations
huh?
>all missiles are terrible short range
huh?
>ww2 dogfight
you get the point

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:22:03 No.120275663 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120275792

>>120275570
hownew.ru

Welcome to /scg/, home of the shitpost.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:24:59 No.120275792 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120275663
I just can't help but wonder

Are they just stupid?
or is it intentional?

Or are they playing 20mins 3 months ago and
considering themselves an expert from the
experience?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:25:04 No.120275798 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120275570
they don't play the game just respost shitposts and gargle dereks recycled issue

they feel it makes them clever

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:29:56 No.120276027 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120276208 >>120276237

>>120178576
We are still saving everything as a backup on tapestorage in our company anon. It's not as outdated as you might think

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:33:36 No.120276208 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120276413 >>120276986 >>120316861

>>120276027
>carefully caress a tape
>it is now ruined

>run magnets over, submerge in water, slam against concrete or set on fire an SSD
>it is fine

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:33:46 No.120276218 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120212120
>0 money spent
>not 0 firepower
How?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:34:10 No.120276237 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120276027
Can confirm
Company has own nationally serving servers
Backup is tapes

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:38:05 No.120276413 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120276208
>SSD just stops working from one day to the other
>Tape just runs fine for decades if you keep it safe

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:49:18 No.120276986 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120276208
ok anon
take your ssd out
slam it on concrete
report back

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 09:54:10 No.120277273 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120280442

Finally got into Arc Corp just now. Was enjoyable for a few minutes before my camera glitched out and would only stare at the ceiling.

2.0 when? I just want to float in my Avenger in space.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 10:50:01 No.120280442 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120277273

Read
>>120274627

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:11:29 No.120281835 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120293670

>>120274627

Shills and shitposting aside, I think most of /scg/ is of the same opinion.

Also, does the game usually hang when you load ArcCorp?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1441139863082.gif, 3MiB, 360x203

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:15:38 No.120282121 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120282330

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15025-Development-Update-Star-Citizen-Crusader-0-Release

oh shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:17:11 No.120282231 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120275570
>>all missiles are terrible short range
>huh?

Are you fucking joking

Most of them have trouble locking on at any kind of range, much less be actually useful at those ranges.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:18:29 No.120282330 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120282872

>>120282121
That's nothing new?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:25:37 No.120282872 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120283173

>>120282330
He was trying to be funny

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:29:24 No.120283173 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120282872
Ohh, Ic. He was trying to trick people into thinking that there's a date for the crusader update?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445540143584.jpg, 165KiB, 1038x1155

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:35:39 No.120283629 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120283915 >>120284010 >>120284110 >>120284854 >>120286496 >>120287040

I want to shitpost in this thread
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3744337&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=743

Is it worth $10 to sign up?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:39:32 No.120283915 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120283629
...no?

Why would you want anything to do with Goons?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:40:51 No.120284010 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120283629
if you don't follow the groupthink you will just get banned anyways

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:42:20 No.120284110 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120283629
What a sad fucking thread, I had to close it after a couple of pages

>Lets talk about each other's fucking cats

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO cancer.jpg, 25KiB, 190x324

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 11:53:13 No.120284854 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120285667

>>120283629

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO gDJPxTf.jpg, 108KiB, 600x441

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:05:41 No.120285667 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120284854

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO SbJerVN.jpg, 474KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:09:55 No.120285953 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:14:07 No.120286262 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120286353 >>120287030

Do we have an org?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:15:33 No.120286353 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120286262
I do.

"we" don't.

nor should "we"

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:17:41 No.120286496 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120283629
>socialist ssander shills
>smarties memes
>cats
Fuck these people are the normiest fucking scum I've ever seen. Holy fuck. Is this where the so randumb meme comes from?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445469559633.jpg, 259KiB, 1154x968

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:18:26 No.120286540 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120286661 >>120286683 >>120286749 >>120286923

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:19:54 No.120286661 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120286540
>Jap slut
>motherly figure

ok.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO drksgy.png, 208KiB, 894x114

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:19:56 No.120286665 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:20:13 No.120286683 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120286540
If they dyed the hair a normal color, understood subsurface mapping / actual texture work, and what human faces look like, they might get up to western standard eventually.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:21:01 No.120286749 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120286540
Why is this allowed?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO drksgy2.png, 493KiB, 1311x172

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:21:58 No.120286826 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:23:09 No.120286923 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120287870

>>120286540
Lightning is BUILT FOR SEX

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO drksgy3.png, 207KiB, 813x138

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:24:00 No.120286990 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:24:34 No.120287030 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120286262
You should shop for the org that best fits your goals and play style.

/scg/ is going to be full of too many different kinds of players for you to pick an org from here.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO whatsomethingawfulisreallylike.jpg, 53KiB, 1067x401

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:24:41 No.120287040 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120283629
>lets just keep reposting the same old shit thread after thread and patting ourselves on the back for it
>derek smart is a hero because i'm too young and too much of a faggot to remember what a complete fuckwit he really is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:35:51 No.120287870 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120286923
Flattest of asses as I recall.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fixed.jpg, 418KiB, 1084x1164

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:36:43 No.120287938 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120288048 >>120290023 >>120292057 >>120301273

>threads are alive again
For what purpose?

Anyway.
>download 1.3
>go into Battle Royale
>play on mouse
>ctrl+c as usual
>instead of fully controlling the direction of the ship, nose now follows the reticule
Am I missing something or they ruined the only way you could play the fucking game on mouse properly? Please tell me there's a way to go to original relative mode or whatever it was called.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:38:13 No.120288048 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120288257 >>120292057

>>120287938
It's been that way for a while friend.
Time to l2fly rather than clicking boxes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:41:22 No.120288257 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120288737 >>120290023

>>120288048
I haven't touched AC since they nerfed REC incomes. Fuck that, then, I'd rather go sell that unplayable shit on reddit now than play Chase The Mouse 2.0.

Thanks for the answer, tho.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 12:47:38 No.120288737 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120288257
>Being so shit you need to grind REC

Its like 3-5 games for me, depending on what ship you're looking to get. 2-3 games for a full loadout of equipment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 13:03:37 No.120290023 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120292057

>>120288257
>>120287938

You are an idiot. Leave.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 13:27:39 No.120292057 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120292160

>>120287938
>>120288048
>>120290023

So joystick or hotas is finally king of space flight?

If so, then good. That's the way it should be

Space Flight: Joystick/hotas
FPS: M+KB
Gamepad: Into the trash.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 13:28:47 No.120292160 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120292057
no?
Mouse is still very much viable, it's just not a point and click fest as it once was.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 13:45:51 No.120293670 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120281835

Yeah, it hangs for a bit, but usually gets better. Most of my problems revolve around either the computer "stalling" or "locking" for about 3 seconds (happens once every 15 mins or so) before returning to normal, or I get disconnected by the infamous "Code 0: Time Out" error from the servers having a fart.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:06:27 No.120301273 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120287938
no, they put lookahead mode on by default

if you turn that off then it's back to normal mouseniggering

right alt + m to turn it off I think

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:33:07 No.120303818 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120304895

>>120296816

>Ved

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Untitled.jpg, 45KiB, 1235x145

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:35:42 No.120304069 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120304895

kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:45:46 No.120304895 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120303818
>>120304069
Is this the best you can do? manufacture your own shitposts?

He doesn't ever post with a tripcode.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445608513023.png, 774KiB, 857x746

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:48:47 No.120305159 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120305235 >>120305297 >>120305563 >>120305767

These threads are boring. We had "major" content updates since the threads started to die, including the social module, and it's dead thread, dead game.

I bet Star Marine won't be much better.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:49:35 No.120305235 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120306171

>>120305159
>I bet Star Marine won't be much better.
At least Star Marine will have semi-meaningful player interaction outside of

>walk around
>wave at people
>dead areas

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:50:18 No.120305297 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120306171

>>120305159
Social module is a 10 minute sideshow

Some people I know like this game almost entirely because of the idea of FPS, as sideways as that sounds. Its an entirely different gameplay element.

The latter will probably produce more traffic than the former.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:53:10 No.120305563 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120306171

>>120305159
Welcome to /scg/ how it was for the last 3 years.
Now sit down until Alpha 2.0 comes out and then until we can actually progress in the game.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:55:30 No.120305767 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120306171

>>120305159
Dreams. Dreams happen now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:57:00 No.120305886 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120305978 >>120306252 >>120306804 >>120317254

>open launcher
>wants to download 30gb of crap
What the fuck did they add? Did they add anything significant? did they fix the ships controlling like bathtubs or is that still part of the CR VISION™

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 15:57:59 No.120305978 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120305886

1.3 was released?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO mn1sGB8.png, 485KiB, 306x405

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:00:02 No.120306171 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120306783

>>120305235
>At least Star Marine will have semi-meaningful player interaction
True, but probably more pay2win than Arena Commander. But I think it will be easier to earn REC, so that's a start.

>>120305297
Even though the social module is essentially just a single map on 1 planet, it's quite a nice-looking environment. I don't see the need to expand the social module much except for adding character customization as well as letting us experience features as they come out, like buying/selling weapons, putting up / taking jobs, etc so we can get used to the game systems.

Hopefully we get SQ42 to play while they make SC.

>>120305563
Actually these threads used to be fast and entertaining, especially during the content leak. Now it feels like just 1 RSI shill being paid overtime to reply angrily every 10 minutes.

>>120305767
See you in space court, Chris.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:00:53 No.120306252 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120305886
They balanced a whole lot of shit, added real nice weapon / missile / explosion FX, and changed the flight model for most ships in quite significant ways.

What you consider to be CR VISION, only you could know.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:06:52 No.120306783 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120306967

>>120306171
There are 77 IPs in this thread.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:07:01 No.120306804 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120307227 >>120307475

>>120305886
Push that recycled meme harder, it'll be cleverererer this time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:07:39 No.120306868 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120238032
As a tesla driver, hes retarded.
The old interface was far better in providing an informative experience. Even Elon is now asking for UI ideas on twitter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:08:40 No.120306967 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120307475

>>120306783
shhhh, don't spoil his autistic fantasy he's built up in his head

everyone that doesn't agree with him is CIGDFLMAOWTFBBQ

you don't want to wake him from his dream, i hear it's dangerous

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:11:26 No.120307227 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120307376

>>120306804
Sorry, would you rather i'd use something involving Derek Smart?

HAAHAH SMARTIES
HAHA SMART SO DUMB XD

There you go. Because that totally hasn't taken it's course yet.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:13:15 No.120307376 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120307793

>>120307227
nobody has ever used "vision" for CR so your the retard pushing it

that's an ED meme

fucking retard

cr always mentions fidelity and immersion, since this is babby's first shitpost

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:14:18 No.120307475 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120307839 >>120315560

>>120306967
>>120306804
These are the type of posts I was referring to.

"Now it feels like just 1 RSI shill being paid overtime to reply angrily every 10 minutes."

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:17:39 No.120307793 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120308151

>>120307376
ow the autism

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:18:08 No.120307839 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120307475
>someone doesn't agree with me so he's a shill!

>someone can't have their own opinion and tell me mine is bad

go back to SA smartie

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:20:53 No.120308096 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>smartie
>shill
>a-alpha
>autism
Great to see that this general continues to be one of the worst on /vg/

i'll be back in another 2 years

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:21:30 No.120308151 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120308301

>>120307793
It's called a concept shit for brains, a shared concept that others understand, making up your own bullshit means nobody knows what the fuck you are meming about.

Is this a difficult concept or do you need a wikipedia entry? Or better yet maybe go post on reddit and do that ELI5 horseshit.

Fuck off to wherever you came from. You have no value, your opinions are bad, and you in general are just a cancerous waste of humanity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:22:58 No.120308301 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120308151
>MUH MEMES
Goddamn son, i didn't think it was possibly but you've got DOUBLE autism

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:23:42 No.120308376 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Anybody else smell fur ITT for some reason?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 146KiB, 1280x1254

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:26:48 No.120308679 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120310226 >>120311470

So, when does everyone think AC 2.0 will release?

I'm thinking Q2 2016.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:43:17 No.120310226 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120308679
Soon

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 16:56:05 No.120311470 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120308679
In my hot opinion, next month.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:07:21 No.120312570 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120314421 >>120317650

Whats your opinion on TTK, nig nogs?

More specifically, the current TTK in 1.3

Not that you've played it

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:22:38 No.120313971 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>join social module
>open chatbox
>faggots boasting about the Idrises and Javelins their orgs have

I'll never complain about the quality of /scg/ again

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:27:29 No.120314421 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120314931

>>120312570
It's too fast. Needs to be significantly slower to allow for more tactics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:32:34 No.120314931 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120315034 >>120315436 >>120315680

>>120314421
All I've heard on the forums and on here is that its far too high

Do you play E:D?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:33:29 No.120315034 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120315436

>>120314931
He's trying to be funny

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO OC.jpg, 113KiB, 500x469

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:35:39 No.120315253 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120315505 >>120315695 >>120316092

I made some OC.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:37:32 No.120315436 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120314931
See >>120315034
I think the TTK is a bit high, but it's doable right now if you aren't utter shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:38:16 No.120315505 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120315560

>>120315253
Nah, you just mangled somebody else's OC.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:38:48 No.120315560 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120315505
>>120307475

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:40:06 No.120315680 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120315781 >>120316036

>>120314931
I haven't played AC in months. I just posted something that I think is moderately true, that slow TTK allows for more tactics.
Fuck if I know how fast the TTK is.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445895339545.jpg, 114KiB, 500x469

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:40:16 No.120315695 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120315804 >>120316036 >>120316092

>>120315253
I made your OC better

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:41:15 No.120315781 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120315905

>>120315680
>Fuck if I know how fast the TTK is.

But you still felt the need to weigh in

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:41:26 No.120315804 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120315695
see >>120212120

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:42:20 No.120315905 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120315781
Because he specifically called out to the faggots that didn't play it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:43:47 No.120316036 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120316891

>>120315695
top kek

>>120315680
I'd agree with you, but there comes a point where it becomes unenjoyable to engage in battle with people who will take 5 - 6 minutes to kill. Prime example: Erectile:Dysfunction. I think the TTK should be at it's limit now. This is sort of fine.

The TTK currently is a little on the higher side, but it's still fun to engage in battles. You should try AC. It's changed quite a bit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO d-rekt scamt.jpg, 113KiB, 500x469

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:44:21 No.120316092 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120315253
>>120315695
Even better now

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:51:51 No.120316861 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120276208
>dis nigga

just fucking google it dickhead

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:52:11 No.120316891 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120317984

>>120316036
The problem is that the actual TTK is extremely low.

A hornet with laser repeaters can kill a maxed out hornet in 5 seconds, from full shields to fully dead. A large amount of your health currently is in shielding, and ballistics bypass this for even lower TTK.

The only reason people die slowly is avoiding fire.

So they can make ships break like twigs under any kind of fire, or make guns even more powerful, but both would break the game.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1443999772084.jpg, 36KiB, 420x418

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:55:04 No.120317159 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Rekt

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1441074202625.jpg, 42KiB, 272x262

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:56:05 No.120317254 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120305886
>ships controlling like bathtubs
>like 10 g's with boost

we already have an FPS module

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:57:36 No.120317393 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120317529 >>120318142 >>120319184

https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/658677375559954432

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:59:00 No.120317529 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120317590

>>120317393
>Four years

well meme'd Derek

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445592695797.jpg, 69KiB, 800x770

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 17:59:40 No.120317590 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120318171

>>120317529
1 year pre-production
3 years after kickstarter

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:00:17 No.120317650 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120317943 >>120318345

>>120312570
hornet takes forever to kill without missiles.

If it were due to shitty weapons that would make sense but it's been a year and they only have a dozen brands of weapon at the most and they handcraft each one so I doubt we will get a million new weapons in PU.

but maybe hornet is supposed to be a ridiculous tank idk

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:03:23 No.120317943 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120318330

>>120317650
>pay $30 for a pooraura
>expect to be able to beat a $170 super hornet with 4x the weapons you have
>come in /scg/ and talk about the game not being pay2win

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:03:49 No.120317984 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120318345

>>120316891
>The only reason people die slowly is avoiding fire.

That's generally how these games work...but I think the smallest ships will be almost impossible to kill. Also you need to have higher speed cap and more maneuverability to even have a chance of killing someone. The meta sounds kinda shitty tbh

I think they should make ballistic shield penetration scale with shield strength

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:05:12 No.120318142 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120317393
wonder how many people are playing LOD

ohh

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:05:30 No.120318171 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120318554

>>120317590
1 year prototype creation
1 year of building studios, hiring people
2 years of actual development.

This shit takes time, man.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:06:39 No.120318296 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120318707 >>120318871

Does anyone knows what happened to that shit eating grin bastard that nobody liked because he tried to be cool and swag?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:06:56 No.120318330 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120318482

>>120317943
this has nothing to do with the hornet's weapons. I'm talking about shooting its belly and it not dying for a long time.

I guess the slower ships will only be useful for guarding more valuable ships

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:07:06 No.120318345 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120317650
The Hornet is meant to be a tank, yes.

But it entirely depends what you're flying, anon.

>>120317984
But thats not how it works

Currently the larger bulkier ships can rip through the more agile ones in 2 seconds of sustained fire or less depending on loadout.

Agile ships sacrifice that firepower for not getting hit at all if you're skilled enough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:08:39 No.120318482 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319010

>>120318330
What are you flying/shooting with?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:09:18 No.120318554 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120318784

>>120318171
No, retard. Both years of prototype creation and the building studios involves development with whoever they have. They hire people to tackle more tasks but they don't slow down the project to do that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:10:55 No.120318707 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120318296
He's still going at it m8. Read the thread.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:11:43 No.120318784 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120318554
>They hire people to tackle more tasks but they don't slow down the project to do that.

The point is they started with 7 fucking staff members, who didn't even have a permanent office, nor any development studios.

Saying the game was in development at that point in any serious way is moronic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:12:32 No.120318871 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120318296
>nobody liked

Take a guess

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:14:09 No.120319010 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319108

>>120318482
probably stock lasers + gatling

only all ballistics loadouts kill anything fast

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:15:05 No.120319108 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319343

>>120319010
>only all ballistics loadouts kill anything fast

Hornet with full laser repeaters puts out enough DPS to destroy a fully shielded Hornet in 5 seconds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:15:46 No.120319168 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319325 >>120319496 >>120319548 >>120319558

So now Dan Tracy is gone.

Welp

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/3qaxn9/dan_tracy_marks_cig_as_previous_job_on_linkedin/cwdkl66

https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/292922/is-lead-technical-designer-dan-tracy-no-longer-with-the-project

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:16:00 No.120319184 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120317393
I honestly feel bad for this guy when he talks about LOD like it's a real game anyone would want to play

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:17:22 No.120319325 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319967

>>120319168
Who cares

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:17:32 No.120319343 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319691

>>120319108
1. that's like twice the firepower of other fighters
2. 5 seconds of sustained fire is a really really long time in a dogfight

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:19:03 No.120319496 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120319168
big deal
The video game industry is the most unstable industry to work in

cue the Goon shitposting and fear mongering

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:19:37 No.120319548 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319967

>>120319168
IT'S ALL OVER NOW

OH FUCK ABANDON SHIP

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:19:42 No.120319558 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120319793 >>120319967

>>120319168
They changed the engine works to Frankfurt studio, where he can't go, so he had no choice but to leave.

This is what they were talking about with restructuring.

They talk about this in the new video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx2NSZOGNqE

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:21:09 No.120319691 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120319343
Sure it is. But its also a Hornet, hitting it is a piece of fucking cake.

Want to know how long it would take a Gladius? 9.3s with all Badgers.Good mix of Ballistics? 3.7s

Again, Hornet is meant to be a brawling tank of a fighter. Anything else is going down easy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:22:24 No.120319793 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120319558
2 minutes until I'm at the part.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:24:14 No.120319967 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120320001 >>120320024 >>120320027 >>120320130 >>120320135

>>120319325
>>120319548
>>120319558

Hmm, I wonder who will leave next.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:24:43 No.120320001 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120320273

>>120319967
Ben Lesnick.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:24:58 No.120320024 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120319967
Probably a lot of people. They have multiple studios and quite a few staff.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:25:00 No.120320027 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120320273

>>120319967
Crossing fingers for Ben

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:25:54 No.120320130 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120320273

>>120319967
Hopefully ben

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:25:56 No.120320135 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120320273

>>120319967
You on chance?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:27:27 No.120320273 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120321604

>>120320001
>>120320027
>>120320130

We can only hope.

>>120320135

I'll be here forever, anon :3

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:29:16 No.120320489 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120320692 >>120320716 >>120320958 >>120320997

>People bitch about people leaving

Have you never worked anywhere but McDonalds before? Even in your normal work enviroment this happens almost on a monthly basis. Our company is in a similar situation (lots of money, from an investor tho) and we are growing continuously. People join, people leave or people are reassigned in the company.

That's everyday business EVERYWHERE in modern capitalism.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:31:25 No.120320692 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120320489
Especially in management, people move in and out very often.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:31:44 No.120320716 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120320959 >>120321024

>>120320489
>cig is like mcdonalds

Can't wait for the SC version of Super Size Me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:33:48 No.120320958 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120321345

>>120320489
But if we thought of this rationally we wouldn't have something to lose our shit over and act like it's end times. We cannot do that. Now take your logic elsewhere you motherfucking nigger

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:33:49 No.120320959 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120320716
>what is AtV

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:34:10 No.120320997 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120320489
b-but muh goon council-led communist video game studio in my mind that can make MMOs in 2 years without paying people

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:34:25 No.120321024 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120321148 >>120321495

>>120320716
Ben's character model?

How bigger than an Idris would it be?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:35:42 No.120321148 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120321024
>implying that can be feasibly calculated

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445124373028.jpg, 29KiB, 500x333

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:37:39 No.120321345 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120320958

I-I..sorry!

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:39:06 No.120321495 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120321024
We would need 128-bit floating point precision for that.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO uwotmate.png, 413KiB, 494x459

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:40:12 No.120321604 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120320273

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Untitled.jpg, 28KiB, 407x338

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 18:57:21 No.120323360 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120323653 >>120323795 >>120324151

Phoenix owners are, quite literally, the cancer killing the community. The only group you could argue as being worse are 890J owners that think the Corvette should be $800+ because it's "military."

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:00:05 No.120323653 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120324616

>>120323360
I'm a Phoenix owner.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:01:27 No.120323795 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120324616

>>120323360
The Idris was over 800 bucks when it was Corvette

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:05:10 No.120324151 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120324798

>>120323360

I never understood those people. I own a phoenix too and I could care less if they sold it to other backers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:09:57 No.120324616 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120323653

Do you believe that the P-72, a snub fighter, should be sold for more than 25% greater price than the M50? If not then you're not part of the problem.

>>120323795

Meanwhile the Idris isn't a Corvette anymore, and its price has absolutely nothing to do with Corvettes. They've several ships of comparable size for less than half of that price.

The Carrack, the Reclaimer, the Orion, and the Hull D are all less than $400. The Endeavor is just over $400 and it's significantly larger than all of the above. Remind me again why a Corvette roughly proportional in size to an Orion should be $800 based solely on the fact that it's a "military ship." That's the reasoning they use in the threads that discuss this, and then they back it up with what you just claimed while ignoring the fact that the Idris is no longer a Corvette anyway.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:11:35 No.120324798 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120325236 >>120326089

>>120324151
I don't even understand why anyone would want to buy a merlin or archimedes without a connie or an idris. If you can't carry it around it's just going to sit in your hangar in the PU.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:15:57 No.120325236 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120325756

>>120324798
Just like all my other ships we spent money on. Because the game will never be released

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:20:51 No.120325756 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120325236
You were forcibly refunded, though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:24:23 No.120326089 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120324798
other ships have hangars

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:30:56 No.120326760 Report Delete

Quoted By:

It's me.

I'm Derek Smart.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Freelancer_2015_10_25_18_45_56_423.png, 1020KiB, 1600x1200

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:40:51 No.120327829 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120328221 >>120328251 >>120328553 >>120329685 >>120350954

>Freelancer was released in 2003
>Women looked like women and had feminine jawlines

What the fuck happened to Star Citizen's character design?

Was kicking Chris off the project what saved Freelancer's women?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:44:46 No.120328221 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120328487 >>120328618

>>120327829
oh cool, what alien species is this?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO youbeingrektbyjudgejudy.jpg, 47KiB, 400x300

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:44:59 No.120328251 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120327829
Boring.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:47:17 No.120328487 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120328667

>>120328221
I believe it's called a "human female". Notice how she was designed with Asian features in mind and as a result actually has feminine beauty and charm.

Think about that for a moment. A fucking character model from 2003 puts Star Citizen's to shame.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:47:51 No.120328553 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120327829
Ugly as fuck holy shit

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ayy.jpg, 55KiB, 616x584

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:48:27 No.120328618 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120328221
It's a Reticulan wearing human flesh as a mask

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:48:54 No.120328667 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120328768 >>120329063

>>120328487
>has feminine beauty and charm
>resembles a blowup doll more than anything else
Why am I not surprised by this?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO keksimus-maximus-img.jpg, 72KiB, 596x628

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:49:53 No.120328768 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120328667

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO StarCitizen_2015_10_25_11_15_22_ (...).png, 2MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:52:25 No.120329027 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120329084 >>120329885

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1372114714018.jpg, 608KiB, 1558x2753

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:52:49 No.120329063 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120329248 >>120331046

>>120328667
>blowup doll

Asian features like round faces are highly sought after in the fashion world for a reason. It's why the hottest models in the world are all Asian.

White features are objectively hideous and women designed with them in mind always come out as man-jawed abominations.

This has been proven time and time again and will continue to happen until western devs wake up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:53:04 No.120329084 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120329885

>>120329027
WITNESSED

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:54:35 No.120329248 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120329063
(You)

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 19:59:22 No.120329685 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120327829
ayy lmao

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO StarCitizen_2015_10_25_11_10_35_ (...).png, 2MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:01:37 No.120329885 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120329027
>>120329084
Moar. Running people over is fun.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO westernvsasian.png, 1MiB, 1002x747

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:02:41 No.120329981 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330537

I can be a cherry-picking retard sperg too.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2015-10-26_00001.jpg, 194KiB, 1680x1050

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:03:07 No.120330026 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330151 >>120330314 >>120330352

Did they put nitroglycerine in the fuel tanks of these greycats?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO StarCitizen_2015_10_25_11_00_40_ (...).png, 2MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:04:22 No.120330151 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330431

>>120330026
Yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:05:57 No.120330314 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330431

>>120330026
More explosive fuel = more fast.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445904187474.jpg, 21KiB, 245x322

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:06:17 No.120330352 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330436

>>120330026

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:07:09 No.120330431 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330673

>>120330151
I managed to park my greycat in the bar, but I don't think you can drive it left towards the tables.

>>120330314
What if they put red stripes down the side, too?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Freelancer_2015_10_26_19_22_57_871.png, 1MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:07:11 No.120330436 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120330352
Saved.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO several years later.jpg, 113KiB, 540x350

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:08:00 No.120330537 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330834

>>120329981
>The one on the right grew up to be cuter anyway

Not seeing your point.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO StarCitizen_2015_10_25_11_02_49_ (...).png, 2MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:09:24 No.120330673 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120330875

>>120330431
I helped someone park it in the bar yesterday.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:10:52 No.120330834 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120330537
>several plastic surgeries later
>your baby still will look like a fetal alcohol syndrome'd tardlet

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:11:17 No.120330875 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120331430

>>120330673
Did you notice the clothes shop was closed but had an "opening soon" sign on it? Hopefully they'll finish the customization soon and put it in the social module.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:13:05 No.120331046 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120329063
[citation needed]

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO StarCitizen_2015_10_25_11_15_12_ (...).png, 2MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:17:27 No.120331430 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120331581 >>120331636

>>120330875
I'm really, really hyped for clothing. Also player customization in general.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:19:00 No.120331581 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120331682 >>120333329

>>120331430
Can we wear bikinis?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO spaceclothes.jpg, 896KiB, 2834x1836

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:19:33 No.120331636 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120332246

>>120331430
Yes I, too, cannot wait to play Pretty Princess Dressup

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:20:07 No.120331682 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120334804

>>120331581
Too problematic.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fashion1.jpg, 345KiB, 2448x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:22:39 No.120331918 Report Delete

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445279047919.jpg, 184KiB, 1076x546

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:22:48 No.120331930 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120334280

[Concern] Problematic intensifies

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO nathan-dearsley-avenger-vs-starw (...).jpg, 161KiB, 1920x773

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:24:32 No.120332072 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120332860

>>120234827
Best dynamics

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1358511706296.jpg, 254KiB, 849x1200

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:26:05 No.120332246 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120332420

>>120331636
I hope the character creator is fleshed it's one of my favorite things to do in a game if the creator is actually decent. I wouldn't mind if they delay it for a year if they can make it on par with Back Desert I doubt it will be as good as Black Desert's though

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1444788131967-3.jpg, 63KiB, 400x500

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:26:14 No.120332257 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120332525

Anyone got a confirmed number of devs that were fired/quit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:27:51 No.120332420 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120332590

>>120332246
Its going to be a slider morph between a multiple facial scan captures, and very limited body sliders because they need to function on the same mocap skeleton.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Hat Citizen.jpg, 185KiB, 1810x1144

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:27:52 No.120332426 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120351391

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO RetaliatorArt.jpg, 583KiB, 2560x1440

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:28:55 No.120332525 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120332257
I fucking love this picture.

>>120234827

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1329187673979.jpg, 409KiB, 1600x1200

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:29:36 No.120332590 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120332420
Do you know of any other games that use this type of character creator?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:30:53 No.120332706 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120234827
>has two
>count them
>two
>turrets
fuck

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Aegis Avenger Stronk pewpew.png, 2MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:32:25 No.120332860 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120332072

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO porn.png, 1MiB, 3560x1461

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:33:09 No.120332941 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120234827
Best ship coming through.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:37:10 No.120333329 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120331581
They just need to hire a bunch of actresses for the boob jiggle mocap.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO bzcftazp.zlw.jpg, 185KiB, 1161x791

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:41:51 No.120333848 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120334161

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:44:56 No.120334161 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120333848
hey there, how are the smarties today? Did you warlord sue yet?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO CdH1bHV.jpg, 590KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:46:07 No.120334280 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120335546

>>120331930

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:50:39 No.120334804 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120331682
>Secret World adds Mankinis and women-only scuba gear as an April Fools path.
>SJWs flip their shit over it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:57:35 No.120335546 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120335723

>>120334280
what the hell is this

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:59:19 No.120335723 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120335546
it's the perfect game

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1443798833695.png, 198KiB, 567x331

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 20:59:31 No.120335738 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120335945 >>120336458 >>120337312

https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/56262/217-desired-professions-found-so-far

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1443999772084.jpg, 36KiB, 420x418

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:01:32 No.120335945 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120336502

>>120335738
218: Furry exterminator
Rekt

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 17yGPFT.gif, 713KiB, 499x366

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:02:14 No.120336015 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120337228

>>120162665
>1st for emperor derek

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1435023529999.jpg, 312KiB, 1640x1765

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:05:48 No.120336458 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120335738
>Snarkenfaugister

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO mFDlEMi.jpg, 559KiB, 2419x1323

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:06:07 No.120336502 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120336710 >>120336723

>>120335945
>not being a fisherman deep behind vanduul lines

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:08:09 No.120336709 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120161863
reminder that this game is never coming out, even SJW goons see that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:08:09 No.120336710 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120336502
>no insurance claims adjuster

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO mFDlEMi.jpg, 730KiB, 2419x1323

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:08:18 No.120336723 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120336943

>>120336502

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:10:24 No.120336943 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120336723
>dancer
>entertainer

ooooh baby come here with those powerful jaws

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:13:06 No.120337228 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120336015
>bens lack of legs not hidden by the red background
The quality of smartie work sure has slipped over the years. I guess they are too busy sucking each others dicks to make quality work these days.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1444422057565.jpg, 2MiB, 3057x2293

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:13:50 No.120337312 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120350168

>>120335738
>cult leader

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:20:56 No.120338051 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120338251 >>120352187

LMAO

https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/289678/goodbye-old-friend

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:22:46 No.120338251 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120338051
>wants 50 auroras instead for his NPC army

jesus

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO scg in a nutshell.png, 574KiB, 534x622

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:23:52 No.120338374 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120338628 >>120338984

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445909032969.png, 472KiB, 534x622

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:26:06 No.120338628 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120338374

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:29:21 No.120338984 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120340776 >>120343094

>>120338374
https://youtu.be/kpvq5wXeeos
Not a great show, but an amusing moment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 21:46:31 No.120340776 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120338984
It was a good enough show. I would've kept watching. It was kind of like Stargate/Lost.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:09:12 No.120343094 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120344805

>>120338984
Speaking of SGU the Destiny was an absolutely gorgeous ship. I mean don't think that the over all shape is for everybody but I think that the little details really make it. Also it had nice balanced armaments, a dozen or so little medium sized turrets and one big cannon tucked under the prow, not over powered but capable. Thinking about it it bares a vague resemblance to the Merchantman, have we seen any art for other Banu ships?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:25:57 No.120344805 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120343094
Go away, confusion.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Freelancer_2015_10_26_22_24_01_556.png, 1MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:27:18 No.120344953 Report Delete

Quoted By:

How do you go from this...

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO uggo.jpg, 89KiB, 602x896

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:29:21 No.120345174 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120346594

TO THIS

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445308178971.jpg, 630KiB, 1600x486

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:42:23 No.120346594 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120347820

>>120345174
Check your privilege, shitlord.

Star Citizen has thousands of individual NPCs and some of them will be nicer to look at than others.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:53:18 No.120347820 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120348447

>>120346594
>all the same height
>no delicious wide hips or oppai sliders

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445367425192.gif, 1MiB, 518x394

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 22:59:27 No.120348447 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120348962

>>120347820
>oppai
Flat chest miracles of the universe?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1445380553254.jpg, 181KiB, 1600x930

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:04:29 No.120348962 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120348447
This guy knows.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:15:59 No.120350168 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120337312
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MieDtki1MJo

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:24:18 No.120350954 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120327829
ayyy

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1386997477103.jpg, 41KiB, 568x726

SpoilerClick to view

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:29:10 No.120351391 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120332426
>Hats 01
>Hats off
>Gay sex with hats on

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:37:41 No.120352187 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120352958

>>120338051
wew

>implying he actually did it the absolute madman

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:46:38 No.120352958 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120353527

>>120352187
he makes the best bait threads tbh

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Oct 2015 23:54:07 No.120353527 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120352958
"he" also lurks scg
>hi hordor

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:19:29 No.120355503 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120356000 >>120356214

>where is the clear personal attack?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO slowreflexisagoon.jpg, 60KiB, 946x513

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:25:21 No.120356000 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120356214

>>120355503
oops forgot pic

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:26:13 No.120356068 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120356594 >>120357840

https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/658761376530329600

:^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:27:45 No.120356214 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120357840

>>120356000
>>120355503
Nobody cares, tbh

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:32:18 No.120356594 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120356068

that's a nice planetside 1 screenshot he has there

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2015-10-27_003429.jpg, 626KiB, 1015x809

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:35:28 No.120356837 Report Delete

Quoted By: >>120356975 >>120357771

kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:37:34 No.120356975 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120356837
Protip: Shohashi is the main dev.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1443957351130.jpg, 145KiB, 1037x719

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:47:46 No.120357771 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120356837
>just putting it right out there in public for everyone to see

Derek just cannot feel shame or embarrassment, it seems

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 00:48:34 No.120357840 Report Delete

Quoted By:

>>120356214
You meant to quote >>120356068 didn't you? Because honestly no one gives a shit about the Lies of Derek game, tbh

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO philosoraptor[1].jpg, 19KiB, 400x400

Anonymous Tue 27 Oct 2015 01:00:04 No.120358789 Report Delete

Quoted By:

https://twitter.com/lodonline/status/658754651983097857
How can someone detonate a nuclear device if no one is playing the game?

Subject

Name

E-mail

Password

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these boards

Your latest searches

/SCG/ Star Citizen General: Patiently Waiting Edition