>>804959No idiot. You start at zero.
A person chooses to vandalize a house.
You now have a deficit.
The owner of the house skullfucks the vandal.
You are now back at zero.
If the vandal returns to skull fuck the original skull fucker, a deficit also returns.
Which is fucking wrong.
The real question and issue is, does skull fucking really correct the deficit without adding excess to the zero sum?
Even if it does add an excess, the fact that the first skull fucking was correcting a deficit means the second skull fucking which would be equal to the first simply reinstates the first deficit from the vandalization of the house.
So he does not equally get to skull fuck back the skull fucker. He must choose something with a lower imaginary zero sum to correct only the excess generated by the skull fucking minus the correction to the deficit for vandalization.
