>>16911461That poorly structured sentence gave me rabies.
>who's a disgusting furfag1. False, 2. Irrelevant to the facts of the matter.
>saying anything bad about it is just trollingAgain, false. I stated earlier that there is a huge amount of genuine cringe available from furries. My contention was that reposting a hoax is a waste of time when there's such a bounty of genuine insanity available.
Furthermore if memory serves right, the person doing the trolling in this case was indeed a furry, they were seeking a rise out of non-furries. They succeeded. YHBT.
