>>16883041Not malice, but control. I merely am making mention of the patterns, and various fields with similar outcomes.
This was my view for the longest time, because I find humans to be a naturally uncooperative, unrecognizable lot. Then I realized you don't need to cooperate, because most people are "just doing their jobs" and don't often think about what they are doing but just doing it. It is easy to get people to do something, because all you have to do is make a policy. Policy is the easiest ways to turn off people's thoughts, and just do things. Politics is already double talk, and so it is easy to think how policies or corporations can have duplicitous policies. Named one thing does another, etc. People who make policies are usually just a few, and not the whole. So, it is very easy to think a small, self interested group wanting to protect its control makes policy to be implemented that pushes down the chain of command either business or government. The middle chain doesn't think, and the lower chain just has to do it. Meanwhile the top laughs. In short, yes, humans are stupid, but yes, they are also controllable. As long as it is not by force and rather enticement or it goes against the system and thus is condoned as wrong or doesn't go against the system and overlooked.
>>16883217If being sane means not thinking or questioning sorry for sane humans.